Latest topics
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:59 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Padre Pio told Fr.Gabriel Amorth," It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false Church" -Bishop Richard Williamson
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Mons. Brunero Gherardini misled the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and many traditionalists
Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM too is teaching error : Bishop Sanborn cannot report at the Chancery office
Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:50 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  Guest on Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:54 am

http://www.traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_012_RatzAnoyimousChrist.htm

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  MRyan on Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:08 pm

More shrill distortion and propaganda from TIA.

But then again, what else is new?
avatar
MRyan

Posts : 2276
Reputation : 2448
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  Guest on Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:12 am

Ok so can you enlighten to us what Cardinal Ratzinger was really trying to say here?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  DeSelby on Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:29 am

Yes, please help us out, MRyan. Elisa too. How can what is written by the then Fr. Ratzinger be squared with anything from the last 2000 years of Catholic Tradition?

Show us how it is taken out of context.

avatar
DeSelby

Posts : 211
Reputation : 231
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  hsilver on Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:21 am

Re: MRyan calling TIA shrill propagandists-- TIA supports baptism of desire/baptism of blood. Boy, some people are never satisfied!
avatar
hsilver

Posts : 12
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2011-01-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  Guest on Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:35 am

I think I would put this forward as evidence for those who say Pope Benedict was once liberal in his younger days and has grown more conservative since then. It's been forty years, and he's come a LONG way since then.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  MRyan on Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:53 pm

RashaLampa wrote:Ok so can you enlighten to us what Cardinal Ratzinger was really trying to say here?
And this is a perfect example of what I was talking about in the other thread about the agenda of Tradition In Action, which you appear to have bought into hook, line and sinker. Your attitude is one of “See, the allegation appears to be true, and if you don’t think its true than the burden is on you to tell us what he was really saying”, as if the words themselves actually convict him. So we begin with an assumption of “guilt”, and it is up to me to prove why the assumption is not only rash, it is totally without basis.

Fine; let’s look at one of the “smoking gun” passages:

This is equivalent to those basic Christian dispositions that the New Covenant calls 'pistis' [faith] and 'agape [love].' It is the presence of these dispositions that distinguishes the 'anonymous Christians' (Rahner) from the pagans, while the absence of these dispositions characterizes hidden pagans from many Christians. One who has these dispositions has the 'essence of Christianity' and saves himself."
So where in this text does Father Ratzinger “defend the false theory” of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner? Where, in other words, does Father Ratzinger suggest that the dispositions of faith and love (the very 'essence of Christianity') are not the dispositions required for justification, or, that these same dispositions are not a “preparation for the Gospel”?

Nowhere does Fr. Ratzinger state or even suggest that the pagan can be saved where he is without the divine light of supernatural faith and without charity.

Furthermore, when he said “One who has these dispositions [of faith and charity] has the 'essence of Christianity' and saves himself”, he is not suggesting that someone who possesses these necessary dispositions can merit salvation on his own; he says this only in the context of Trent, where in Sess. 6, Ch. 5 (On the necessity, in adults, of preparation for Justification, and whence it proceeds) it declares:

The Synod furthermore declares, that in adults, the beginning of the said Justification is to be derived from the prevenient grace of God, through Jesus Christ, that is to say, from His vocation, whereby, without any merits existing on their parts, they are called; that so they, who by sins were alienated from God, may be disposed through His quickening and assisting grace, to convert themselves to their own justification, by freely assenting to and co-operating with that said grace: in such sort that, while God touches the heart of man by the illumination of the Holy Ghost, neither is man himself utterly without doing anything while he receives that inspiration, forasmuch as he is also able to reject it; yet is he not able, by his own free will, without the grace of God, to move himself unto justice in His sight. Whence, when it is said in the sacred writings: Turn ye to me, and I will turn to you, we are admonished of our liberty; and when we answer; Convert us, O Lord, to thee, and we shall be converted, we confess that we are prevented by the grace of God.
If Fr. Ratzinger was trying to put a positive “Catholic” spin on Rahner’s “theory” - so what? But let no man say that Fr. Ratzinger “defended” the “false” theory of Rahner’s without proof. This is not “proof”, it is circumstantial evidence that does not stand up to the light of truth, and it reflects an agenda to destroy the credibility of Pope Benedict XVI by shedding so called “light” on his writings as priest and then Cardinal Ratzinger.

I am not saying that much of what Fr. Ratzinger wrote is not troubling, or even seemingly heterodox; but it is quite another thing to accuse him of a “false” belief in the salvation dogma by this type of this out-of-context and circumstantial “evidence” which is nothing less than a hatchet job.

One just assumes Fr. Ratzinger was a liberal modernist (and still is), and here’s the “proof” - it proves nothing except the bias and agenda of the one presenting the false “evidence”.
avatar
MRyan

Posts : 2276
Reputation : 2448
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  MRyan on Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:57 pm

hsilver wrote:Re: MRyan calling Tradition In Action shrill propagandists-- Tradition In Action supports baptism of desire/baptism of blood. Boy, some people are never satisfied!

So "supporting" baptism of desire and baptism of blood is proof of what, exactly?

Luther defended the law of baptism and devotion to our Blessed Mother.

So what.
avatar
MRyan

Posts : 2276
Reputation : 2448
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Fr. Joseph Ratzinger defends the false theory of the 'anonymous Christian' by Karl Rahner

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum