Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Yesterday at 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church : no contradiction

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church : no contradiction

Post  Lionel Andrades on Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:52 am



The SSPX teaches that the baptism of desire ( explicit for us) is an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/the-sspx-teaches-that-baptism-of-desire.html#links

The Letter of the Holy Office makes it an issue. It considers the baptism of desire an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/the-letter-of-holy-office-makes-it.html#links

Has the SSPX committed a mistake when it considers the baptism of desire as being relevant to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/has-sspx-committed-mistake-when-it.html#links

Letter of the Holy Office '49 with the irrational inference is rejected : Vatican Council II without the false premise is accepted
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/letter-of-holy-office-49-with.html#links

Modernists in Rome and the SSPX are in agreement
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/modernists-in-rome-and-sspx-are-in.html#links

Martrydom is not a known exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2014
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/martrydom-is-not-known-exception-to.html#links

Pope Francis says outside the Church there is no salvation -Michael Voris
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/pope-francis-says-outside-church-there.html#links

Invisible persons cannot be an exception on earth to Fr.Leonard Feeney saying every one needs the baptism of water for salvation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/invisible-persons-cannot-be-exception.html

I accept implicit baptism of desire according to Vatican Council II, Mystici Corporis etc
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/i-accept-implicit-baptism-of-desire.html

Even if there were many cases of persons saved with the baptism of desire ( without the baptism of water) it would be irrelevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/even-if-there-were-many-cases-of.html

We do not know any potential St.Emerentiana or St.Victor so there is only one way of salvation in the Catholic Church in 2014
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/you-do-not-know-any-potential.html

Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church : no contradiction
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catechism-of-catholic-church-affirms.html

If someone has justification God will provide the means for the baptism of water
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/if-someone-has-justification-god-will.html

Modernists in Rome and the SSPX in agreement: 1949 Holy Office Letter teaches Modernist version of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus - CathInfo. forum
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/modernists-in-rome-and-sspx-in.html

Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake with the Letter of the Holy Office and carried it over into Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/archbishop-lefebvre-made-mistake-with.html

No one is saved without the baptism of water given to adults with Catholic Faith
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/no-one-is-saved-without-baptism-of.html

You can witness a martyrdom but cannot say the person is a martyr and is in Heaven without the baptism of water
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/you-can-witness-martyrdom-but-cannot.html

Fault is with the SSPX Resistance.They have used the irrational premise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/fault-is-with-sspx-resistancethey-have.html

Hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted over the centuries
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/hypothetical-cases-cannot-be-exceptions.html

This would be an error even if it was said by Pope Francis or Archbishop Lefebvre
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/this-would-be-error-even-if-it-was-said.html

A Catholic school boy and a Buddhist meet Archbishop Marchetto and Professor Roberto de Mattei at their next meeting
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/a-catholic-school-boy-and-buddist-meet.html

Where is the actual case of someone saved outside the Church ? There is none
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/where-is-actual-case-of-someone-saved.html

Supporters of Fr.Leonard Feeney unfortunately still use the irrational inference .It can be seen in their interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/supporters-of-frleonard-feeney.html

Priests who offer Holy Mass in the vernacular now affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus : SSPX, Fr.Paul Kramer deny it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/priests-who-offer-holy-mass-in.html

Where does the Letter of the Holy Office make a factual error ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/where-does-letter-of-holy-office-make.html

Implicit desire is always implicit. Did the Holy Office assume it was explicit?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/implicit-desire-is-always-implicit-did.html

I talk in terms of visible and invisible only because Catholics in general are unaware that they are using these terms
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/i-talk-in-terms-of-visible-and.html

Objectively we cannot see a baptism of desire case: the Holy Office 1949 implies we can
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/objectively-we-cannot-see-baptism-of.html

The Holy Office 1949 used the dead man walking and visible theory : it was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/the-holy-office-1949-used-dead-man.html

Fr.Fehlner has to accept the Batman version of Vatican Council II : Franciscans of the Immaculate are still receiving threats on doctrine
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/frfehlner-has-to-accept-batman-version.html#links

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum