Latest topics
» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM and Christine Niles approve liberal theology on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Christine Niles misses the elephant in the living room
Fri May 15, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Cardinal Pell recommends the Roman Forum and telling a lie
Wed May 13, 2015 9:43 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» GOOGLE CLOSES DOWN BLOG EUCHARIST AND MISSION
Tue May 12, 2015 9:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise. The SSPX could affirm this
Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:25 am by George Brenner

» Cardinal Raymond Burke approved Fr. John Hardon's error
Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:27 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:49 am by Lionel Andrades

» Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Church documents with an irrational premise and conclusion and offers the Traditional Latin Mass
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:25 am by Lionel Andrades

» Beautiful Gregorian Chant
Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:10 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:47 am by Lionel Andrades


Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate forced to proclaim a lie

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate forced to proclaim a lie

Post  Lionel Andrades on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:56 pm

The Franciscan Capuchins  and Conventuals  say ' a ray of the Truth'(Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II) refers to deceased saved without the baptism of water. It is further speculated that these deceased  now in Heaven were non Catholics. Then it is speculated (inferred) that these cases are VISIBLE on earth! So they become physically visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Nostra Aetate 2 becomes a break with Tradition and the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church. NA 2 refers to salvation outside the Church which is visible for the Capuchins and Conventual Fathers.

This is the interpretation of Vatican Council II ( with the dead-saved and visible theory) which the Franciscan Friars and Sisters of the Immaculate have to accept.

It is with this irrationality of the dead-saved with ' a ray of the Truth', who are visible on earth,that the Franciscan Capuchin and Conventual Fathers accept Vatican Council II.
Relatives of the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate could phone up the Vatican and ask them where are these deceased and visible exceptions in Rome?

Why do the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have to say that those saved with ' a ray of the Truth' are visible on earth and these physically visible cases are explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.?

Why cannot the Sisters says that those saved with ' a ray of the Truth' are possibilities only, hypothetical cases  for us, who can only be known to God?

Even the nieces and nephews of the good Sisters will understand that this is all irrational and not Catholic and the Sisters are expected to affirm this to have their community regularised by the Vatican.Even the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate have to accept this irrationality to be allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass and to be given access to their seminary once again.Upon this irrational premise seminarians have to build a fantasy theology.

Please ask Fr.Fredrick Lombardi S.J, the Vatican spokesman to name someone in 2014 , who has been saved with ' a ray of the Truth'.Why are the Sisters expected to endorse this irrational inference ?

Ask him to cite any Church document before 1949 which says that the baptism of desire- cases are physically visible to us.There are no such references.

Then why must the Sisters accept the Holy Office 1949 inferring that the deceased saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire  are visible to us  and so are exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The relatives of the Franciscan Friars and Sisters of the Immaculate, the Mannelli and Pia families, are perhaps discovering that the Vatican is forcing these religious to accept factual errors.

It is common knowledge that the dead-saved are not visible on earth.It is an objective error for the Vatican to infer that these deceased-saved are visible on earth and so there is salvation outside the Church.

This is dishonesty and a falsehood.The Sisters as Catholics are supposed to proclaim and support a lie  which results in a non traditional and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades


Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum