Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades


The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Post  Lionel Andrades on Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:03 am

The Society of St.Pius X uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  in its interpretation of Vatican Council II.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE
1.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949( also referred to as the Suprema Haec by progressivists) assumes that all salvation in Heaven ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc) are physically visible on earth. These visible in the flesh cases of the deceased who are now saved and in Heaven, it is inferred are explicit exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.THEY ARE VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES.

This irrationality forms also the thelogical understanding of Vatican Council II for the SSPX and the liberals.

VATICAN COUNCIL II
2.The SSPX rejects Vatican Council II since for them  being saved with ' a ray of the Truth(NA 2), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), elements of sanctification and truth(LG Cool, invincible ignorance(LG 16) ARE ALSO VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES. So for the SSPX they are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Since there are visible in the flesh exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus the  SSPX  rejects Vatican Council II.

The same error is there also in the Letter of the Holy Office but the SSPX accepts the Letter of the Holy Office. Archbishop Lefebvre approved the Letter of the Holy Office.

Archbishop Lefebvre made the same irrational error in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II.

The liberals use the same irrationality.They however except Vatican Council II.

Ambrose on the forum CathInfo notices: .
It is good that you see this, because there are many who falsely attribute the teaching of the 1949 letter(Letter of the Holy Office) with Vatican II theology.
 1

When the SSPX bishops and priests are  aware of this error they simply have to affirm that all salvation in Heaven is visible and known only to God and is not physically visible to us on earth.
This will set things right.  Catholics will understand.  They will see that Vatican Council II is traditional.-Lionel Andrades
1.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=33276&min=9&num=3

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum