Latest topics
» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM and Christine Niles approve liberal theology on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Christine Niles misses the elephant in the living room
Fri May 15, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Cardinal Pell recommends the Roman Forum and telling a lie
Wed May 13, 2015 9:43 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» GOOGLE CLOSES DOWN BLOG EUCHARIST AND MISSION
Tue May 12, 2015 9:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise. The SSPX could affirm this
Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:25 am by George Brenner

» Cardinal Raymond Burke approved Fr. John Hardon's error
Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:27 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:49 am by Lionel Andrades

» Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Church documents with an irrational premise and conclusion and offers the Traditional Latin Mass
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:25 am by Lionel Andrades

» Beautiful Gregorian Chant
Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:10 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:47 am by Lionel Andrades


The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Post  Lionel Andrades on Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:03 am

The Society of St.Pius X uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  in its interpretation of Vatican Council II.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE
1.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949( also referred to as the Suprema Haec by progressivists) assumes that all salvation in Heaven ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc) are physically visible on earth. These visible in the flesh cases of the deceased who are now saved and in Heaven, it is inferred are explicit exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.THEY ARE VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES.

This irrationality forms also the thelogical understanding of Vatican Council II for the SSPX and the liberals.

VATICAN COUNCIL II
2.The SSPX rejects Vatican Council II since for them  being saved with ' a ray of the Truth(NA 2), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), elements of sanctification and truth(LG Cool, invincible ignorance(LG 16) ARE ALSO VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES. So for the SSPX they are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Since there are visible in the flesh exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus the  SSPX  rejects Vatican Council II.

The same error is there also in the Letter of the Holy Office but the SSPX accepts the Letter of the Holy Office. Archbishop Lefebvre approved the Letter of the Holy Office.

Archbishop Lefebvre made the same irrational error in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II.

The liberals use the same irrationality.They however except Vatican Council II.

Ambrose on the forum CathInfo notices: .
It is good that you see this, because there are many who falsely attribute the teaching of the 1949 letter(Letter of the Holy Office) with Vatican II theology.
 1

When the SSPX bishops and priests are  aware of this error they simply have to affirm that all salvation in Heaven is visible and known only to God and is not physically visible to us on earth.
This will set things right.  Catholics will understand.  They will see that Vatican Council II is traditional.-Lionel Andrades
1.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=33276&min=9&num=3

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum