Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Go down

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Post  Lionel Andrades on Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:03 am

The Society of St.Pius X uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  in its interpretation of Vatican Council II.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE
1.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949( also referred to as the Suprema Haec by progressivists) assumes that all salvation in Heaven ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc) are physically visible on earth. These visible in the flesh cases of the deceased who are now saved and in Heaven, it is inferred are explicit exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.THEY ARE VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES.

This irrationality forms also the thelogical understanding of Vatican Council II for the SSPX and the liberals.

VATICAN COUNCIL II
2.The SSPX rejects Vatican Council II since for them  being saved with ' a ray of the Truth(NA 2), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), elements of sanctification and truth(LG Cool, invincible ignorance(LG 16) ARE ALSO VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES. So for the SSPX they are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Since there are visible in the flesh exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus the  SSPX  rejects Vatican Council II.

The same error is there also in the Letter of the Holy Office but the SSPX accepts the Letter of the Holy Office. Archbishop Lefebvre approved the Letter of the Holy Office.

Archbishop Lefebvre made the same irrational error in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II.

The liberals use the same irrationality.They however except Vatican Council II.

Ambrose on the forum CathInfo notices: .
It is good that you see this, because there are many who falsely attribute the teaching of the 1949 letter(Letter of the Holy Office) with Vatican II theology.
 1

When the SSPX bishops and priests are  aware of this error they simply have to affirm that all salvation in Heaven is visible and known only to God and is not physically visible to us on earth.
This will set things right.  Catholics will understand.  They will see that Vatican Council II is traditional.-Lionel Andrades
1.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=33276&min=9&num=3

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum