Latest topics
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:59 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Padre Pio told Fr.Gabriel Amorth," It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false Church" -Bishop Richard Williamson
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Mons. Brunero Gherardini misled the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and many traditionalists
Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM too is teaching error : Bishop Sanborn cannot report at the Chancery office
Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:50 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades


The SSPX (SOS-Resistance) does not clarify if they are referring to Vatican Council II with or without the premise.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The SSPX (SOS-Resistance) does not clarify if they are referring to Vatican Council II with or without the premise.

Post  Lionel Andrades on Wed Aug 20, 2014 2:52 pm

The SSPX (SOS-Resistance) does not clarify if they are referring to Vatican Council II with or without the premise.
There is a video put out by the Society of St.Pius X (SOS-Resistance) which says Vatican Council II is the greatest disaster since the founding of the Church.They SSPX (SOS) does not clarify if they are referring to Vatican Council II with or without the premise.

Whenever they criticize Vatican Council II they should clarify that this is Vatican Council II with the false premise.It is Vatican Council II with the dead man visible premise.This is the Vatican Council II of the Vatican Curia and the SSPX SOS.
This is the Vatican Council II which assumes all salvation in Heaven is physically visible  for us on earth.It infers that non Catholics are saved without the baptism of water.These cases it is assumed  are visible on earth.These deceased non Catholics are inferred to be visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is irrational, ridiculous and heretical.Yet this is the Vatican Council II understood by the magisterium,the traditionalists and sedevacantists.The original Vatican Council II was not irrational.The original Vatican Council II does not use the false premise.Without the false premise the Council is traditional.
So it must always be clarified if one is referring to a Vatican Council II with or without the irrational premise.
Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7 indicates most people are on the way to Hell without 'faith and baptism'.This is what I believe. This is how I interpret Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council II does not say that salvation in Heaven is visible to us.It does not say there is known salvation outside the Church.It does not state that Nostra Aetate 2, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8 are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The text does not make this inference.So I do not use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.This is how I interpret the Council.It is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors,the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the Council of Trent and the rest of Tradition.There is no  hermenutic of rupture.
We have found the missing link, the missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle .We now know what makes Vatican Council II traditional or non traditional.It is: the false premise!.
We need to target the false inference and the theological train will get back on the rails.
Identify the premise and change the Church!
-Lionel Andrades

I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/i-do-not-use-irrational-inference-false.html

Cantarella understands that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus: extend the reasoning to Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/cantarella-understands-that-baptism-of.html

Another baptism of desire list in which it is assumed that the deceased are visible to us
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/another-baptism-of-desire-list-in-which.html

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-sspx-uses-same-irrational-theology.html

I reject an explicit baptism of desire and affirm the traditional and centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.If it is not explicit it is not an exception
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/reject-explicit-baptism-of-desire-and.html

Reconciliation with the SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/reconciliation-with-sspx.html

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum