Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Informal Excommunication

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Informal Excommunication

Post  MotelKamzoil on Tue Feb 17, 2015 8:21 am

The case today involving those who have been restricted to community service because of diocesan/parish screening policies is a sad one. These people, who under an all encompassing discriminatory Church law to select out those accused of sexual offenses, as taken liberties to extend the restriction to anyone regardless of severity and date of occurance of a civil crime.

This practice is reprehensible, and unbecoming a religious Institution who's mandate is mercy, and given the difficulty the Church(Mater et Magistra) has with dealing with truant nations in issues of capital punishment and abortion. The Church sees the disposition of the civil entity, and we would expect it to conduct itself accordingly in it's selection of information made available to it by an entity clearly at odds with Divine morality. Instead of narrowing it's focus to records that it told the Faithful it had interest in, it now includes everyone under the same restriction.

But with this post, I wish to address just three of many consequences of this discriminatory and broadly applied practice. The impact is to restrict the faithful from certain community service. Intentionally or not, the policy carries out the same consequences an excommunication by delict would, and in doing so, negates the portion of the vows of many of them in orders which state they are to do community service. We have now a state of individuals, the greater proportion who have paid their debt to society 20-40 years ago, who are in a limbo. They can relate with those who are formerly excommunicated, but are left with no formality. This assists the Church's position of delving in corrupt practices, because then it knows these cannot press for a hearing where no excommunication as been officially incurred through bans,etc.

Secondly, ministering to the vulnerable imprisoned carries a new policy, where now the pastors need to pass on the good news which every promulgation demands. They need to inform the imprisoned that on exit there is a good probability that they will meet discrimination in their requests for community employment, and that they are unofficially excommunicated.

The Church's new policy of partnering with corrupt entities, rather than dealing with it has a student, must past on this new morality to grade school children, where it is now permissible to associate with evil, and adopt a 'no tolerance, no forgiveness' policy. They can also apply non condign perpetual sentencing emulating the example of their Church.  

The worst is the creation through good intention of a common evil. Through not thinking over clearly the consequences of this promulgation, it creates a bonum apparens, as it uses a means(records) born out of evil created by a corrupt entity plagued with unregulated due process systems, and the official use of the practices frowned on in 2 Cor 2,6.
 
The vulnerable today are those whom the Church has betrayed. If it's dogma applies to itself, it will be held accountable for lacking in trust of the Holy Spirit, and going beyond it's allowable policies.

Indeed bring on the traditional Church. Show us the maximum extent of it's mercy as displayed in it's Benefit of Clergy. Pass a law that will place a one time only forgiveness of offense in these deserving years where crime is at all time low, and restrict screening to those you say are a risk. Ask yourself,"How is it the Church did not fail without the screening methods for 2000 years".

MotelKamzoil

Posts : 2
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2015-02-17

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum