Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum)
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» The Unity of the Body (the Church, Israel)
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySun Mar 17, 2024 9:23 am by tornpage

» Defilement of the Temple
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyTue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage

» Forum update
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage

» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyThu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan

» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyFri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage

» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage

» Isaiah 22:20-25
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage

» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage

» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyThu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan

» Do Feeneyites still exist?
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyWed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne

» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage

» Inallible safety?
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyThu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan

» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan

» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyFri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne

» Anyone still around?
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyMon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne

» Angelqueen.org???
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptyTue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
March for Life 2015 : double standards  EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades


March for Life 2015 : double standards

Go down

March for Life 2015 : double standards  Empty March for Life 2015 : double standards

Post  Lionel Andrades Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:02 am

March for Life 2015 : double standards  A13-BurkeOK-255x171


March for Life 2015 : double standards

The March for Life will be held in Rome on May 10, 2015. Cardinal Raymond Burke is expected to be present.

Cardinal Raymond Burke approved an article by Fr.John Hardon, which rejects the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.If the dogma on salvation, approved by three Church Councils can be changed why would His Eminence expect Church teachings on pro-life and family issues to not also change?

There will be other particpants at the March for Life who also reject the traditional interpretation of the dogma on salvation.Among them could be the Catholics, John Henry Weston and Hilary White of Lifesites news.
 
I have mentioned in a previous blogpost on Eucharist and Mission, that Fr.John Hardon's error was that he made an irrational inference. He assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance or with implicit desire referred to personally known, nameable cases in the present times.This was a false inference.This then became a false premise for him. Since he concluded that these cases of persons saved, this category of people, now in Heaven, were explicit exceptions to all needing the baptism of water, in the present times.They were exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. So based on the wrong premise, he wrongly concluded that every one did not defacto, in the present times, need to enter the Church for salvation. He used an irrational premise ( the dead-saved are visible on earth) which resulted in an irrational conclusion ( everyone does not have to defacto enter the Church).

Since he assumed that salvation in Heaven is explicit for us, those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance, became exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So for him every one did not have to become a formal member of the Church, but only they had to, who were not in invincible ignorance.While those who knew about Jesus and the Church and yet did not enter were on the way to Hell.So he changed the original teaching which said all with Original Sin need the baptism of water.

This was the original mistake made by the Holy Office and the Archdiocese of Boston in 1949 when they assumed that a category of people now in Heaven were objective exceptions on earth to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Fr.Hardon wrote an article on outside the Church there is no salvation in which he repeated this mistake.Also as a consultant to the Holy See on the Catechism of the Catholic Church he let this error pass conspicuously in CCC 1257 (The Necessity of Baptism) and with confusion in CCC 846 (Outside the Church No Salvation).
 
Cardinal Raymond Burke approved this article by Fr.Hardon. Cardinal Burke  also recommends the Catechism of the Catholic Church which incorporates this confusion while he has never affirmed the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This is also observed in Cardinal Raymond Burke's criticism of Vatican Council II. Salvation in Heaven is an explicit exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma. So LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to visible in the flesh cases in 2015. Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors for Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke. It is a break with the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities.This was also Fr.John Hardon's mistake.
 
If salvation in Heaven was not explicit, seen in the flesh for them, then there would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II would be Feeneyite.It would not contradict the traditional teaching on non Catholics needing to convert into the Church to avoid Hell. Since the ecclesiology would still be traditional.

The 2015 March for Life seems like another case of Mark Shea being all for pro life issues and other Catholic teachings but changing the Nicene Creed, rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrationality.
John Henry Weston and Hilary White of LifeSites.com use the same irrationality, approved by Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Richard Cushing in 1949 - and Cardinal Raymond Burke.
Weston will not say that all need to enter the Church for salvation in 2015 ,with no exceptions.Life sites' cofounder is Protestant Steve Jalsevac.

According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, Jalsevec like the founder of Lifenews Steve Ertelt are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church formally.This is also the doctrine of the Church (without the irrational premise and conclusion).They  ignore this when they cover Catholic issues.

Like Cardinal Raymond Burke, John Henry Weston and Hilary White interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality.Lumen Gentium 16 etc would refer to known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church. They would have to be known to be exceptions.This shows up on Lifesites reports on Vatican Council II, Franciscans of the Immaculate etc.

For these pro life Catholics participating in the March for Life annually in Rome, abortion would be a mortal sin.To change the Church teachings on salvation would not be a mortal sin (or possibly they are not aware of the irrationality). How can those who 'develop' a dogma defined by three Church Councils not expect teachings on the family and divorced and remarried receiving the Eucharist, not also develop.Cardinal Kaspar has  said that he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Just as pro-life Catholics expect  Catholics to live the teachings of the Church on abortion, contraceptives etc they also must affirm the Church's teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church. Abortion is a mortal sin. So also is denying the Nicene Creed and the defined dogma with an irrational premise and conclusion.
-Lionel Andrades

March for Life : double standard of participants
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/march-for-life-double-standards-of.html

Rome made a mistake in 1949 and Fr.John Hardon did not notice it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/rome-made-mistake-in-1949-and-frjohn_3.html

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum