Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades


March for Life 2015 : double standards

View previous topic View next topic Go down

March for Life 2015 : double standards

Post  Lionel Andrades on Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:02 am




March for Life 2015 : double standards

The March for Life will be held in Rome on May 10, 2015. Cardinal Raymond Burke is expected to be present.

Cardinal Raymond Burke approved an article by Fr.John Hardon, which rejects the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.If the dogma on salvation, approved by three Church Councils can be changed why would His Eminence expect Church teachings on pro-life and family issues to not also change?

There will be other particpants at the March for Life who also reject the traditional interpretation of the dogma on salvation.Among them could be the Catholics, John Henry Weston and Hilary White of Lifesites news.
 
I have mentioned in a previous blogpost on Eucharist and Mission, that Fr.John Hardon's error was that he made an irrational inference. He assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance or with implicit desire referred to personally known, nameable cases in the present times.This was a false inference.This then became a false premise for him. Since he concluded that these cases of persons saved, this category of people, now in Heaven, were explicit exceptions to all needing the baptism of water, in the present times.They were exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. So based on the wrong premise, he wrongly concluded that every one did not defacto, in the present times, need to enter the Church for salvation. He used an irrational premise ( the dead-saved are visible on earth) which resulted in an irrational conclusion ( everyone does not have to defacto enter the Church).

Since he assumed that salvation in Heaven is explicit for us, those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance, became exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So for him every one did not have to become a formal member of the Church, but only they had to, who were not in invincible ignorance.While those who knew about Jesus and the Church and yet did not enter were on the way to Hell.So he changed the original teaching which said all with Original Sin need the baptism of water.

This was the original mistake made by the Holy Office and the Archdiocese of Boston in 1949 when they assumed that a category of people now in Heaven were objective exceptions on earth to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Fr.Hardon wrote an article on outside the Church there is no salvation in which he repeated this mistake.Also as a consultant to the Holy See on the Catechism of the Catholic Church he let this error pass conspicuously in CCC 1257 (The Necessity of Baptism) and with confusion in CCC 846 (Outside the Church No Salvation).
 
Cardinal Raymond Burke approved this article by Fr.Hardon. Cardinal Burke  also recommends the Catechism of the Catholic Church which incorporates this confusion while he has never affirmed the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This is also observed in Cardinal Raymond Burke's criticism of Vatican Council II. Salvation in Heaven is an explicit exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma. So LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to visible in the flesh cases in 2015. Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors for Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke. It is a break with the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities.This was also Fr.John Hardon's mistake.
 
If salvation in Heaven was not explicit, seen in the flesh for them, then there would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II would be Feeneyite.It would not contradict the traditional teaching on non Catholics needing to convert into the Church to avoid Hell. Since the ecclesiology would still be traditional.

The 2015 March for Life seems like another case of Mark Shea being all for pro life issues and other Catholic teachings but changing the Nicene Creed, rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrationality.
John Henry Weston and Hilary White of LifeSites.com use the same irrationality, approved by Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Richard Cushing in 1949 - and Cardinal Raymond Burke.
Weston will not say that all need to enter the Church for salvation in 2015 ,with no exceptions.Life sites' cofounder is Protestant Steve Jalsevac.

According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, Jalsevec like the founder of Lifenews Steve Ertelt are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church formally.This is also the doctrine of the Church (without the irrational premise and conclusion).They  ignore this when they cover Catholic issues.

Like Cardinal Raymond Burke, John Henry Weston and Hilary White interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality.Lumen Gentium 16 etc would refer to known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church. They would have to be known to be exceptions.This shows up on Lifesites reports on Vatican Council II, Franciscans of the Immaculate etc.

For these pro life Catholics participating in the March for Life annually in Rome, abortion would be a mortal sin.To change the Church teachings on salvation would not be a mortal sin (or possibly they are not aware of the irrationality). How can those who 'develop' a dogma defined by three Church Councils not expect teachings on the family and divorced and remarried receiving the Eucharist, not also develop.Cardinal Kaspar has  said that he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Just as pro-life Catholics expect  Catholics to live the teachings of the Church on abortion, contraceptives etc they also must affirm the Church's teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church. Abortion is a mortal sin. So also is denying the Nicene Creed and the defined dogma with an irrational premise and conclusion.
-Lionel Andrades

March for Life : double standard of participants
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/march-for-life-double-standards-of.html

Rome made a mistake in 1949 and Fr.John Hardon did not notice it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/rome-made-mistake-in-1949-and-frjohn_3.html

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum