Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Yesterday at 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion

Post  Lionel Andrades on Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:49 am




Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion

Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism ( p.119) suggests non Catholics in general can be saved and this is his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He comes to this conclusion by assuming the following, of which we must be aware.This is his inference.

1. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong. The strict interpretation of the dogma is contradicted by cases of persons saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.

2.Those who are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire were explicit exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma ( even though they are in heaven and not on earth).

3.So since there are exceptions to the dogma we now accept that a non Catholic can be saved in his religion outside the Church. He does not need to be a formal member of the Catholic Church to go to Heaven.

4.If there can be one such case there can be many.

5.So it is possible that most people, most non Catholics will be saved. They will be saved through Jesus and the Church. They will be saved in general and without having to enter the Church with 'faith and baptism' (Ad Gentes 7).


So Fr.Robert Barron concludes elsewhere as Michael Voris often quotes him as saying, we have a reasonable hope that all men will be saved.

This is the theology which was accepted by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI.This is magisterial. So Michael Voris is not expected to touch it.

The weak link in this common chain of reasoning, is inferring that those saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance are personally known to us,  objectively seen in the flesh.Explicit  in the present times.This is a false premise to reason with.

It with this irrational proposition that we have the irrational conclusion of Fr.Robert Barron.

It is theology , a new theology, based on an irrational premise which creates a non traditional, new doctrine on salvation, which has been accepted by the magisterium
.
-Lionel Andrades

Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict also used the false premise and conclusion from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/pope-john-paul-ii-and-pope-benedict.html

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum