Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Yesterday at 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Cardinal Pell recommends the Roman Forum and telling a lie

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Cardinal Pell recommends the Roman Forum and telling a lie

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Wed May 13, 2015 9:43 am



Cardinal Pell has recommended the Roman Forum where they all use Apparition Theology just like him.

They will offer the Traditional Latin Mass next month in Gardone,Italy but reject the traditional ecclesiology with their Apparition Theology(AT).It is because they use AT the Roman Forum 'traditionalists' are approved by the Vatican. They are in line with the magisterium's new theology, which is a break with the past and an interpretation of Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture.This is politically correct and every one seems happy at Guardano,Italy this summer.

By interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with the past, they are affirming the same interpretation of the Council, and other Church documents,as the liberals and dissenters.So the Roman Forum members protect their careers and interests by choosing to interpret magisterial documents with an irrational premise and inference to produce a break with Tradition.
If they did not do this they would not have the approval of Cardinal Pell who would not answer two simple questions which I put to him in Rome. He would not answer them by e-mail and nor would he speak to me at his office.
The two questions which members of the Roman Forum , like Mons.Barreiro in Rome,  would not answer were:-

1.Do we we know anyone in the present times( 2014-2105) saved without the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance ? ( Can we physically see such cases who are now in Heaven)? NO ANSWER TO THIS.
2.Since we physically cannot see such persons on earth there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which says all need to be formal members of the Church ? ( There are no known cases in 2014-2015 saved without 'faith and baptism'?) NO ANSWER HERE ALSO FROM CARDINAL PELL OR ROMAN FORUM MEMBERS.

Instead the reasoning used by the Roman Forum members and the magisterium is that we do know of persons saved in 2015  with th baptism of desire or invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water.We can see apparitions.
So since these cases are visible to them in the present times (like the seers see Our Lady at Medugorje), they can see these apparitions of non Catholics in Heaven. They are explicit exceptions to the old teaching on all needing to formally convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
So the members of the Roman Forum conclude that Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) refer to known apparitions and so Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Any way this is how the whole world interprets LG 16 and Vatican Council II.

On the other hand if they all answered those two questions honestly they would say that there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the rigorist interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church repeated this error in 1257 when it stated that God is not limited to the Sacraments.It was as if Cardinal Ratzinger knew of someone who did not need faith and baptism and would be saved or, someone who was already in Heaven in 1992 without faith and baptism. This was the irrational inference made by Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani in 1949 in the Boston Case.

Now if members of the Roman Forum speak the truth they would be contradicting the magisterium in the Letter of the Holy Office and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 1257, 846).The professors of theology like Joseph Shaw, John Lamont and Thomas Pink, associated with the Roman Forum,  would be denied the mandatum from the bishop to teach theology. This would be the loss of their livelihood and reputation.

Mons. Ignacio Barreiro could not be allowed to offer Holy Mass in Rome if he spoke the truth.

So the next meeting Gardone is to be another drama. They will pretend that Vatican Council II is a break with the past ( and the liberals will clap) and not mention that they are interpreting the Council with the irrational premise and inference-and in no way are they going to make the mistake of answering in public those two questions.
 

-Lionel Andrades

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 59
Reputation : 157
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum