Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Ronald Knox on baptism of desire

Go down

Ronald Knox on baptism of desire

Post  Guest on Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:57 pm

http://jonmsweeney.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/ronald-knox-on-the-baptism-of-desire/

Ronald Knox on (the) baptism (of desire)

I should certainly be very much surprised if I found myself in a heaven which didn’t contain Socrates and Plato and Virgil and plenty of other people who, at first sight, would have no right to be there. How it is that such souls come to be saved we don’t know. Some have thought that at the very moment of death, and perhaps even after the moment at which a doctor would give a certificate of medical death, an illumination is given to them which, if they accept it, will achieve the baptism of desire. Others prefer to think that the desire of baptism can be implicitly contained in an act of love towards God, even an act that is confused, even an act that is inarticulate. We don’t know.

–Ronald Knox, from “The Unconscious Catholic”

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Ronald Knox on baptism of desire

Post  columba on Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:10 am

That's interesting Rasha.
Ronald Knox died in 1958 so he was a quite recent theologian. It seems from that quote that he was not aware of baptism of desire being a doctrine of the faith as he was even then still speculating on the possibility.
Hope MRyan reads this.
avatar
columba

Posts : 979
Reputation : 1068
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: Ronald Knox on baptism of desire

Post  MRyan on Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:39 pm

columba wrote:That's interesting Rasha.
Ronald Knox died in 1958 so he was a quite recent theologian. It seems from that quote that he was not aware of baptism of desire being a doctrine of the faith as he was even then still speculating on the possibility.
Hope MRyan reads this.
And this is a perfect example of what I was talking about in the other thread about your conflating of the established doctrines of baptism of desire/baptism of blood as they apply to someone who possesses the requisite supernatural faith, charity and desire for baptism, with invincible ignorance where the limits to such ignorance cannot be so easily “defined”.

How the "baptism of desire" may be achieved in someone in invincible ignorance would undergo further development (with certain aspects remaining unresolved), especially in light of the teachings of Pope Pius Pius IX, the first Pope to articulate the Church's position on Invincible Ignorance.

Socrates and Plato lived some four centuries before Christ, while Virgil lived around 70 B.C; so the law of baptism was not yet promulgated. As such, Monsignor Knox could only be referring to baptism of desire in an analogical sense to describe the possibility of a translation to justice by “the desire thereof” to know and do the will of God under the Old Dispensation.

The issue for Msgr. Knox is clearly invincible ignorance and the conditions under which an “illumination” of the true God may be realized while remaining ignorant of His Revelation to the Jews.

There is simply no basis for you to suggest that Msgr. Knox was not aware of the doctrine of “baptism of desire” simply because he was speculating on how one might “achieve the baptism of desire” while in invincible ignorance.

And as far his statement that “Others prefer to think that the desire of baptism can be implicitly contained in an act of love towards God, even an act that is confused, even an act that is inarticulate. We don’t know”, Msgr. Knox is not speculating on whether baptism of desire can be implicit in an act of love, but only whether this act of love can be confused and even inarticulate, such as it might have been with Plato, Socrates or Virgil.
avatar
MRyan

Posts : 2276
Reputation : 2448
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Ronald Knox on baptism of desire

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum