Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:01 pm

Rules for Discussion of Sedevacantism-
The following are the rules for the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum. First take notice on the top of the forum, that the owner of the forum, Rasha Lampa, is not a sedevacantist and submits to the authority of Pope Benedict XVI. Second, in this sub-forum you will notice that there are different rules for sedevacantists and for non-sedevacantists. These are because the faults that each of these groups commits when debating on forums is distinct. Minor violations or slip-ups will result in the post being edited (conserving the substance of the argument). Posts that are beyond repair will just be deleted. Repeated violations will result in the forum member being banned.


Last edited by Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:07 pm

Rules for sedevacantists:
The purpose of allowing the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum is to examine the issue in theory as well as to examine the evidence. This is not the place for sedevacantists to try to convert forum members to sedevacantism. Therefore the following rules are established:

#1. Do not put the names or titles of priests or Bishops ordained/consecrated in the post-Vatican II rites in quotes. Example: "Father" Corapi, "Cardinal Ratzinger".

#2. Do not refer to any of the Post-Vatican II popes as "antipopes" when using their title, example: "Antipope Benedict XVI." If you are a sedevacantist and have a problem with calling him the Pope please use "Benedict XVI."

#3 Avoid rants or exhortations to the other members of the forum, stick to the arguments.

The proper way to conduct yourself in the sedevacantism section is thus (quoting specific Church documents not just generalities):
"I think the current claimant to the Papal Throne is in heresy because of the following quote: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and the following document is evidence that a manifest heretic cannot be Pope."

This is the improper way to conduct the debate:
"I am on my knees praying for all of you that have embraced the Great Apostasy and are stuck in the clutches of the Novus Ordo Church."


Last edited by Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:15 pm; edited 2 times in total
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:08 pm


Rules for non-Sedevacantists
The purpose of allowing the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum is to examine the issue in theory as well as to examine the evidence. Therefore the following rules are established:

#1. If you don't want to discuss sedevacantism, then you do not have to, do not come to this sub-forum.
#2. Do not use ad hominem attacks on sedevacantist forum members.
#3 Avoid rants or exhortations about how sedevacantism is totally absurd (without citing some arguments or reasons), how sedevacantists are kooky or sedevacantists are mentally ill, or anyone who considers it are out of their mind, etc, etc, etc. Stick to logical arguments especially based on Church documents.

The proper way to conduct yourself in the sedevacantism section is thus (quoting specific Church documents not just generalities):

"Mr. Sede you are wrong because the document you quote really means such and such. It is a non-authoritative document. Also, the other document that you cite is missing the last paragraph which states......."

This is the improper way to conduct the debate:
"Sedevacantism is a disease, I am praying for you that you come back to the fold and stop following two self-proclaimed Benedictines who live in a trailer park in Upstate New York."
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum