Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Go down

Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:01 pm

Rules for Discussion of Sedevacantism-
The following are the rules for the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum. First take notice on the top of the forum, that the owner of the forum, Rasha Lampa, is not a sedevacantist and submits to the authority of Pope Benedict XVI. Second, in this sub-forum you will notice that there are different rules for sedevacantists and for non-sedevacantists. These are because the faults that each of these groups commits when debating on forums is distinct. Minor violations or slip-ups will result in the post being edited (conserving the substance of the argument). Posts that are beyond repair will just be deleted. Repeated violations will result in the forum member being banned.


Last edited by Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:07 pm

Rules for sedevacantists:
The purpose of allowing the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum is to examine the issue in theory as well as to examine the evidence. This is not the place for sedevacantists to try to convert forum members to sedevacantism. Therefore the following rules are established:

#1. Do not put the names or titles of priests or Bishops ordained/consecrated in the post-Vatican II rites in quotes. Example: "Father" Corapi, "Cardinal Ratzinger".

#2. Do not refer to any of the Post-Vatican II popes as "antipopes" when using their title, example: "Antipope Benedict XVI." If you are a sedevacantist and have a problem with calling him the Pope please use "Benedict XVI."

#3 Avoid rants or exhortations to the other members of the forum, stick to the arguments.

The proper way to conduct yourself in the sedevacantism section is thus (quoting specific Church documents not just generalities):
"I think the current claimant to the Papal Throne is in heresy because of the following quote: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and the following document is evidence that a manifest heretic cannot be Pope."

This is the improper way to conduct the debate:
"I am on my knees praying for all of you that have embraced the Great Apostasy and are stuck in the clutches of the Novus Ordo Church."


Last edited by Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:15 pm; edited 2 times in total
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Forum Janitor on Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:08 pm


Rules for non-Sedevacantists
The purpose of allowing the discussion of sedevacantism on this forum is to examine the issue in theory as well as to examine the evidence. Therefore the following rules are established:

#1. If you don't want to discuss sedevacantism, then you do not have to, do not come to this sub-forum.
#2. Do not use ad hominem attacks on sedevacantist forum members.
#3 Avoid rants or exhortations about how sedevacantism is totally absurd (without citing some arguments or reasons), how sedevacantists are kooky or sedevacantists are mentally ill, or anyone who considers it are out of their mind, etc, etc, etc. Stick to logical arguments especially based on Church documents.

The proper way to conduct yourself in the sedevacantism section is thus (quoting specific Church documents not just generalities):

"Mr. Sede you are wrong because the document you quote really means such and such. It is a non-authoritative document. Also, the other document that you cite is missing the last paragraph which states......."

This is the improper way to conduct the debate:
"Sedevacantism is a disease, I am praying for you that you come back to the fold and stop following two self-proclaimed Benedictines who live in a trailer park in Upstate New York."
avatar
Forum Janitor
Admin

Posts : 235
Reputation : 565
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Forum Janitor

http://catholicforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Rules for the Sedevacantism Sub-Forum (Read Before Posting)

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum