Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Go down

Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:54 pm

Others, including canonist Dr. Edward Peters and Fr. John Zulhsdorf, also wrote on the subject, pointing out the same thing: The law requiring head coverings ceased no later than the release of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which abrogated the prior law requiring this (found in the 1917 Code).

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/womens-head-coverings-at-mass-wont-say-i-told-you-so-but-.-.-

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:09 pm

True, but this shouldn't be overlooked:
The wearing of a chapel veil for women is not required when women assist at the Holy Mass according to Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is, however, the expectation that women who assist at the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form cover their heads, as was the practice at the time that the 1962 Missale Romanum was in force. It is not, however a sin to participate in the Holy Mass according to the Extraordinary Form without a veil.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:55 pm

In Russia they have some babushkas (Russian grandmothers) that patrol the Church looking for women without veils. Unfortunately here in the States most Eastern Catholics and even Orthodox do not have veils.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:40 pm

MarianLibrarian wrote:True, but this shouldn't be overlooked:
The wearing of a chapel veil for women is not required when women assist at the Holy Mass according to Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is, however, the expectation that women who assist at the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form cover their heads, as was the practice at the time that the 1962 Missale Romanum was in force. It is not, however a sin to participate in the Holy Mass according to the Extraordinary Form without a veil.

Don't you see that this is where the NO Church has it wrong. They tell Greek rite Catholics not to Latinize because it turns the Ortodox off, big downer. They will never return if they see Latinization, but if SSPX sees that women are permitted to not wear head covering at the Trad Latin Mass, its gonna be a downer too. Can they give communion in the hand at the TLM too? If SSPX sees that then they will never return, or are they even out? I'm confused? They're in talks to return but aren't in schism and no excommunication is enforced. WTH! The Church is a mess!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Lourdes on Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:12 pm

The Church is a mess!

I couldn't agree with you more!

Lourdes

Posts : 156
Reputation : 162
Join date : 2011-02-19
Location : USA

Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:14 pm

Expectation is something that shouldn't be overlooked (and to a certain extent, can somewhat be enforced). Just because there is no sin attached to not wearing a headcovering at the TLM doesn't mean a priest can't require it at his parish and provide the means to fulfill it (ex. a box in the back with extra veils).

cowboy wrote:Can they give communion in the hand at the TLM too?
No.

During the more popular Holy Days my priest always addresses visitors at the TLM during the homily and tells them the practice is to receive communion on the tongue while kneeling at the communion rail--or they may stand if age or injury prevents kneeling--but the reception of the Eucharist is on the tongue at the TLM.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum