Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Women's Head Coverings at Mass

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:54 pm

Others, including canonist Dr. Edward Peters and Fr. John Zulhsdorf, also wrote on the subject, pointing out the same thing: The law requiring head coverings ceased no later than the release of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which abrogated the prior law requiring this (found in the 1917 Code).

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/womens-head-coverings-at-mass-wont-say-i-told-you-so-but-.-.-

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:09 pm

True, but this shouldn't be overlooked:
The wearing of a chapel veil for women is not required when women assist at the Holy Mass according to Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is, however, the expectation that women who assist at the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form cover their heads, as was the practice at the time that the 1962 Missale Romanum was in force. It is not, however a sin to participate in the Holy Mass according to the Extraordinary Form without a veil.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:55 pm

In Russia they have some babushkas (Russian grandmothers) that patrol the Church looking for women without veils. Unfortunately here in the States most Eastern Catholics and even Orthodox do not have veils.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:40 pm

MarianLibrarian wrote:True, but this shouldn't be overlooked:
The wearing of a chapel veil for women is not required when women assist at the Holy Mass according to Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is, however, the expectation that women who assist at the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form cover their heads, as was the practice at the time that the 1962 Missale Romanum was in force. It is not, however a sin to participate in the Holy Mass according to the Extraordinary Form without a veil.

Don't you see that this is where the NO Church has it wrong. They tell Greek rite Catholics not to Latinize because it turns the Ortodox off, big downer. They will never return if they see Latinization, but if SSPX sees that women are permitted to not wear head covering at the Trad Latin Mass, its gonna be a downer too. Can they give communion in the hand at the TLM too? If SSPX sees that then they will never return, or are they even out? I'm confused? They're in talks to return but aren't in schism and no excommunication is enforced. WTH! The Church is a mess!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Lourdes on Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:12 pm

The Church is a mess!

I couldn't agree with you more!

Lourdes

Posts : 156
Reputation : 162
Join date : 2011-02-19
Location : USA

Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Guest on Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:14 pm

Expectation is something that shouldn't be overlooked (and to a certain extent, can somewhat be enforced). Just because there is no sin attached to not wearing a headcovering at the TLM doesn't mean a priest can't require it at his parish and provide the means to fulfill it (ex. a box in the back with extra veils).

cowboy wrote:Can they give communion in the hand at the TLM too?
No.

During the more popular Holy Days my priest always addresses visitors at the TLM during the homily and tells them the practice is to receive communion on the tongue while kneeling at the communion rail--or they may stand if age or injury prevents kneeling--but the reception of the Eucharist is on the tongue at the TLM.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Women's Head Coverings at Mass

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum