Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Go down

Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  columba on Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:18 pm

This is an interesting article by a certain Dan O'Connell.
He makes the point that Sedevacantists and Novus Ordo Conservatives both believe the same thing concerning the Papacy. That is, "The Pope can do no wrong."
As the pope can do no wrong then the sede's must determine that if he does do wrong then he can't be the pope. The N.C's reason, as the pope can do no wrong then we must follow every word he says and imitate everything he does.

The truth is, both these positions are based on a false or ignorant view of the office of the Papacy.

http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f025ht_Sedevacantim.htm
avatar
columba

Posts : 979
Reputation : 1068
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  Guest on Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:29 pm

The whole debate hinges around two questions: when does a Catholic definitively become a non-Catholic and who is allowed to judge the Pope of Rome.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  Guest on Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:10 pm

columba wrote:This is an interesting article by a certain Dan O'Connell.
He makes the point that Sedevacantists and Novus Ordo Conservatives both believe the same thing concerning the Papacy. That is, "The Pope can do no wrong."
As the pope can do no wrong then the sede's must determine that if he does do wrong then he can't be the pope. The N.C's reason, as the pope can do no wrong then we must follow every word he says and imitate everything he does.

The truth is, both these positions are based on a false or ignorant view of the office of the Papacy.

http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f025ht_Sedevacantim.htm

Very good article and brings up some points I've been discussing with a friend for awhile.
I know they were not asserting the Arron was the "pope" of old but the point was clear, that there was an ultimate authority. Also I think they missed a significant point in the Gospels when Our Lord says:

Mt 23:2
“The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them. "

So I would speculate that Moses was the "pope".

Another point to add is if EVERYTHING the pope said was orthodox then there would be no reason for Vat I saying that he is only infallible in certain cases--ex cathedra. He can error but the error can not infect the official dogmatic teaching.

Finally I speculate that the "teaching" the pope can't be a heretic was a way to explain infallibility. In the 1600's it was known that "Peter has Spoken" as the last authority but how to explain it was the rub. I still need to research this but I surmise it.

There was a "heretic" pope elected I don't have the reference anymore. It was in a book by Dr. Warren Carol "History of Christendom" first book, I think. An Arian emperess arranged for some bishop to be pope and preach Arianism and to canonize Socrates, and Plato. He agreed before hand to this but when elected pope refused and said now I speak with peter or something like that. I think he may have been martyred. Anyone have this reference?

BTW: Excellent book "History of Christendom" although at one point it struck me, he (Carrol) says how great it was that some Arian heretic was preaching to pagans. Weird. On the whole avery good book series, he is a very good writer. He worked for CIA so I think he is still tainted by traces of neoconism/right wing liberalism.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  Catholic_Truth on Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:39 am

columba wrote:This is an interesting article by a certain Dan O'Connell.
He makes the point that Sedevacantists and Novus Ordo Conservatives both believe the same thing concerning the Papacy. That is, "The Pope can do no wrong."
As the pope can do no wrong then the sede's must determine that if he does do wrong then he can't be the pope.

Actually that is not what Sedes believe. Sedes do recognize that a Pope can sin. But there is a difference between regular sin and sin which separates a person from the Church. Sin that separates a person from the Church is the sin of heresy. So if any "catholic" publicly rejects even just one dogmatic teaching of the Church, then that is heresy and the individual ex-communicates themselves from the Church ipso facto(automatically).
avatar
Catholic_Truth

Posts : 116
Reputation : 149
Join date : 2010-12-19
Location : Louisiana

http://www.PaltalkExpress.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  HolyRussia on Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:33 am

As Catholic Truth makes abundantly apparent, you need to define "wrong" for this accusation leveled against sedevacantists to have any substance whatsoever.

Does anyone here really find no difference between sedes and neocons as to what they believe regarding the papacy? It seems to me that there is a big, meaningful and significant difference, and one that makes the linkage between the two groups absurd. Sedes believe someone who is publicly and materially wrong about the faith cannot be pope; Neocons believe someone who is pope cannot be wrong. The inversion is significant.

Thus, Sedes: wrong cannot be pope. Neocons: pope cannot be wrong.
avatar
HolyRussia

Posts : 13
Reputation : 13
Join date : 2010-12-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  MRyan on Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:41 pm

Interesting it may be, but not impressive in the least.

I read it once before, and find it every bit as offensive now as I did then. The extreme positions the author attempts to characterize are gross exaggerations. Also, coming from the TIA, it is blatantly hypocritical.

Now on one level the sede-vacantist position is the reciprocal of most of the world's modernist Bishops who believe Benedict XVI is the Pope, but they don't believe in all the rights and authority of the Papacy. A ruse they conveniently employ under the concept of Collegiality.
The TIA believes Benedict XVI is the Pope and they believe in all the rights and authority of the Papacy, but they also believe that Pope Benedict XVI is a pertinacious heretic before God who rejects Benedict as His true Vicar, but leaves him in place as a cardboard caricature the TIA can throw darts at while refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the very rights and authority they hypocritically say he possesses. Forget about “kissing the Koran”, we’re talking about his Primacy and the supreme authority over the Liturgies, the Laws and the teachings of the Church.

And I find this just a bit absurd:

So, the big question is: Did the Lord Jesus Christ ever intimate that Caiaphas was not the High Priest/Pope? The answer is: no. The Lord Jesus Christ, who had more reasons than anyone to be a sede-vacantist, was not. When it comes to apostasy and heresy, Caiaphas pretty much takes the cake, but Our Lord never challenged the fact that he was High Priest/Pope.
The implication is clear; if Benedict XVI is a heretic, Caiphas, the High Priest and “pope” was even a worse apostate and a heretic for not recognizing our Lord and for plotting His death (just like St. Paul, who also knew Scripture).

This is the point he misses: Never once did our Lord tell the Jews that they could disobey the High priest (who receives his authority directly from God) in the observance of the Laws and Rituals - He said just the opposite.

I simply take such nonsense for what its worth.
avatar
MRyan

Posts : 2276
Reputation : 2448
Join date : 2010-12-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Neo Cons & Sede's both in the same boat

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum