Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum)
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» The Unity of the Body (the Church, Israel)
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyThu Apr 04, 2024 8:46 am by tornpage

» Defilement of the Temple
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyTue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage

» Forum update
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptySat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage

» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyThu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan

» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyFri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage

» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage

» Isaiah 22:20-25
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage

» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage

» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyThu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan

» Do Feeneyites still exist?
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyWed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne

» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptySat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage

» Inallible safety?
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyThu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan

» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan

» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyFri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne

» Anyone still around?
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyMon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne

» Angelqueen.org???
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptyTue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades


The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences

Go down

The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences Empty The Galileo Controversy and its Consequences

Post  columba Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:00 pm

Here's an intersesting short article by Robert Sungenis.
By admission of BXVI, the reason for VatCII was the correcting of errors of those past Church extremes in doctrine. The problem being, if such errors existed (and we were led to believe they did) then what's to stop such errors from being present in any future Church doctrine (or VatII for that matter). Once the admission is made that "the Church can err," she immediately loses her credibility as the sole, divinely inspired teacher of the faith.

For article see link below:

http://www.catholicintl.com/images/stories/Pope_Benedict_XVI_Says_Vatican_II.pdf

columba
columba

Posts : 979
Reputation : 1068
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum