Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left

View previous topic View next topic Go down

SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am

DECEMBER 12, 2017

SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
If the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX ) announces that they accept Vatican Council II( Feeneyite/without the irrational premise) Rabbi Rosen  will object.He will clarify that the SSPX must only accept Vatican Council II(Cushingite/with the premise) for "good relations with the Jews(Left)".He will be supported by Rabbi Segno and Rabbi Lara in Italy with their threat.They have the Anti-Semitic law as a weapon.

But with Vatican Council II(Feeneyite/premise free) the SSPX will meet the demand to accept Vatican Council II as set by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.But it would mean the SSPX  accepts the old ecclesiology in harmony with Vatican Council II. Sp there could only be an ecumenism of return with the old ecclesiologly. Since the old ecclesiology does not teach that there is known salvation outside the Church.
The new ecclesiology teaches that there is salvation outside the Church and so this is an opening for the new ecumenism.
So accepting Vatican Council II would not be enough for the Vatican.It has to be with accepting that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church and so every one does not need to be a member of the Church to avoid Hell.
Vatican Council II was never really the issue. The issue is ecclesiology.The issue  is having to interpret all magisterial documents with the irrational premise to create a new ecclesiology.
So the FSSP and Institute of Christ the King, traditionalist religious communities,are allowed by Pope Francis to offer the Tridentine Rite Mass.They proclaim the new ecclesiology.It is Cushingite.It uses the invisible people are visible premise contradicting the Principle of Non Contradiction.
It results in a non traditional conclusion.These invisible-visible non Catholics it is concluded, are examples of salvation outside the Church.So invisible- for- us- baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the old St. Benedict Center.This is the new fantasy theology which is approved by ecclesiastical Masonry.
The present St.Benedict Centres have also accepted Vatican Council II with the new ecclesiology and so are allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass.One community has canonical status ahead of the SSPX.
The SSPX knows that they simply have to make an announcement  saying they accept only Vatican Council II( Feeneyite/without the invisible people are visible premise) and then they will meet the principal demand of Ecclesia Dei,which is Vatican Council II.
But then their property will be threatened by the Jewish Left.Also it could be demanded that the Vatican give the SSPX a leftist excommunication. The SSPX may not be able to legally call themself Catholic.
Any other Catholic religious community,Dominicans, Salesians, Redemptorists etc who follow the SSPX and accept Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally, will receive the same penalties from the Vatican.Since the priority of the two popes is not to be physically attacked by Mosad.
So now Catholic children in Detroit, for example, are taught Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and this is accepted by Michael Voris  and Dr. Ralph Martin there.Since they have to protect their interests.
The threats had probably come to Michael Voris and CMTV a long time back.So he stopped supporting the traditionalists and started shouting from the roof tops that the SSPX is in schism. This is the same line as the leftist papers.
The SSPX still correctly chooses not to  accept Vatican Council II(Cushingite/interpreted with an irrationality) as does Michael Voris,Louie Verrecchio, David Domet and the other Lefebvrists.
Hilary White has a blog post which says the churches in Spain are empty.They are empty since, among other reasons, there is no more fire in the Church, the fire of the Holy Spirit.No one is saying all Jews and Muslims are going to Hell according to Vatican Council II(premise free).Hilary White, Michael Matt and Christopher Ferrara do not want to upset the Jewish Left.The traditionalists White,Matt and Ferrara will not say that all Muslims are going to Hell according to the Catholic Church without the Jewish Left angle.
Muslims during the birthday celebrations of the prophet Mohammad(Milad ul Nabi) in Muslims countries sing religious songs(Naats) in praise of Mohammad.They put other Muslims in prison,who believe in Allah, but do not accept Mohammad as the last prophet of God.They have to begin and end their prayers to God with the name of Mohammad whom the Catholic Church considers lost for all eternity since he died without 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)

So presently Rorate Caeili and the blog LMC Chairman regularly criticize Vatican Council II without differentiating between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Feeneyite.Since this could be costly.
How many times has this to be brought to the attention of Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, but he will not do anything since he knows from where the money comes and he would not want the Vatican to give him the same treatment Fr. Nicholas Gruner received.
Fr.Gruner and  John Vennari could not understand the difference between the two interpretations of Vatican Council II or may be they too were prudently protecting the little they had.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 11, 2017
Were the excommunications of Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney leftist excommunications?: their fault was orthodoxy

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 59
Reputation : 157
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum