Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

Sarum and Ambrosian Rites?

Go down

Sarum and Ambrosian Rites?

Post  Guest on Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:14 pm

I found this topic surfing on CAF:
This was posted by laszlo:

"Until the XIX Ecumenical council (Trent) the Liturgy was not centrally coordinated. The basic principle: Lex credendi => Lex orandi was was observed, the Liturgy followed the principles of Catholic faith, but the same doctrine can be expressed by different ways.

Practically every diocese or religious order could have her own Liturgy, and many of them actually had. This had a very easy reason: the Liturgy (adding new celebrations of forms) was constantly changing and before the invention of the printing of the books it was impossible to provide the whole Church with standardized copies.

The differences were not only in words, but also structural. The Roman Canon consist of separate prayers and with insignificant variation is the same throughout the year, the Eastern Canons (and the Mosarabic in the Western word) are continuous prayers and there are different canons for different occasions.

The Gallican Liturgy started in the turn of the second millennium, an mushroomed in the 15th and 16th Century. It was characterized by the abundance of hymns (sequences) and processes, from which the Entrance, Offering and Communion process was reinstated in the 1970 Mass. The printed books exaggerated the variations everyone pushed his own liturgy.

St Pius V ordered the Central command over the Liturgy, ordering the renewed for of the Roman Liturgy all over the world. Only a few religious order and the Toloose (Mosarabic) and Milan (Ambrosian ) dioceses get exception. (In England the Catolics were illegal in that time, the Sharum or any other remainder from the Celtic rite did not get legality). As a matter of fact both the Mosarabic and Ambrosian rites were abandoned during the following Century for the favor of the Roman rite and revived only with the liturgical reform of the 20th Century.

At this moment outside of the various Eastern Catholic rites only the Ambrosian and Mosarabic rites are accepted, and as far as I know each underwent some changes, the Eastern Catholic rites even toward the vernacular during the Liturgical reform of the 20th Century.

I made a compendium of the Western rites

it is a dynamic page, select the rite and language at the top for comparison. 'Source' link at the bottom list the sources of the versions. It is not scientific (the textual critic need serious lifetime research) but gives some overview. It would be worthwhile to include the more diverse Eastern Catholic rites too."

I found this fasinating at the website he created here:[/url]


Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum