HomeLatest topics
Is the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 regarding Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic Apologetics
Page 1 of 1
Is the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 regarding Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
Lionel Andrades Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:49 am
June 12, 2014
Is the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 regarding Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/is-sspx-general-chapter-statement-2012.html#links
If the 'magisterium' of 1949 inferred Catholics could see the dead it was an objective error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/if-magisterium-of-1949-inferred.html#links
Is the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 regarding Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/is-sspx-general-chapter-statement-2012.html#links
If the 'magisterium' of 1949 inferred Catholics could see the dead it was an objective error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/if-magisterium-of-1949-inferred.html#links
Lionel Andrades- Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08
Similar topics» The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II
» SSPX affim Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, keeping this principle before you
» Fr. Joesph Fenton on the 1949 Holy Office Letter
» Factual Errors in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
» Holy Office Letter of 1949: What position did it "condemn"?
» SSPX affim Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, keeping this principle before you
» Fr. Joesph Fenton on the 1949 Holy Office Letter
» Factual Errors in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
» Holy Office Letter of 1949: What position did it "condemn"?
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic Apologetics
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» Defilement of the Temple
» Forum update
» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
» Isaiah 22:20-25
» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
» Do Feeneyites still exist?
» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
» Inallible safety?
» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
» Anyone still around?
» Angelqueen.org???
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
» Piazza Spagna - mission
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella