Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum)
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» The Unity of the Body (the Church, Israel)
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyThu Apr 04, 2024 8:46 am by tornpage

» Defilement of the Temple
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyTue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage

» Forum update
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptySat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage

» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyThu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan

» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyFri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage

» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage

» Isaiah 22:20-25
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage

» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage

» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyThu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan

» Do Feeneyites still exist?
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyWed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne

» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptySat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage

» Inallible safety?
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyThu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan

» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan

» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyFri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne

» Anyone still around?
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyMon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne

» Angelqueen.org???
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptyTue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades


It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum

Go down

It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum Empty It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum

Post  Lionel Andrades Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:09 pm

It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum Creed

It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc- Cantarella, CathInfo.forum

Cantarella
Level 4


This letter of 1949 claims that there are known exceptions to the Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma which has been defined by three Church Councils. The known exceptions are supposed to be the souls who die "invincible ignorant" of the True Faith and are saved through subjective and ambiguous "implicit desire via last minute baptism of desire".

This letter is also a straighforward and blant rejection of the Nicene Creed "I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin" which refers to water Baptism only, the sacrament that has been revealed by God Himself. It is being implied in Suprema Haec that there are three or more known baptisms: water, desire, blood etc. Unfortunately, Vatican II curia - Novus Ordo, sedevacantists such as CMRI, and even SSPX priests such as Fr.Francois Laisney are guilty of the same faulty reasoning.

It seems that that the "traditionalists" can only point out to the errors in Vatican II but cannot really provide an alternative since they act unaware of the Cushing Heresy (invincible ignorance -> denial of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) which is the cause of those errors.

Thank be to God, Saint Benedict Center is not closed but far from. The crusade for the defense of the Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma and the conversion of America is most alive and thriving. St. Benedict Center was granted canonical status by the Church and is in full communion with Eternal Rome.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=33174&min=9&num=3  Suprema Haec

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum