Latest topics
Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News
Page 1 of 1
Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
JUNE 26, 2017
Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
IN A A MAJOR SSPX CLARIFICATION: TOWARDS A DOCTRINAL AGREEMENT? BYFR.JEAN MARIE GLEIZE IN THE REMNANT NEWSPAPER THE WRITER HAS MADE THE USUAL OBJECTIVE ERRORS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH REFERENCE TO THE DOGMAEXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS. HE DID THE SAME IN 2009 DURING THE DOCTRINAL TALKS WITH THE VATICAN.
IN THE ARTICLE POSTED ON THE REMNANT HE REPEATS THE SAME CUSHINGITE ERRORS WHICH HE HELD DURING THE TALKS.HERE ARE FOUR POINTS. THERE WERE OTHERS.I HAVE MENTIONED THEM IN A PREVIOUS BLOG POST.AS EXPECTED HE HAS NOT ADDRESSED THE ISSUE.PERHAPS ITS UNBELIEVABLE FOR HIM, THAT THE ERROR WAS THERE ALWAYS RIGHT BEFORE HIM AND HE DID NOT NOTICE IT.
I had written about these errors of the SSPX even during the SSPX-Vatican doctrinal talks held during the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI but Fr. Gleize did nothing.Since 2009 he has ignored this issue.
In his article for the Remant Newspaper he makes the following errors.
1. The religious liberty of Dignitatis Humanae and the positive secularism of Gaudium et Spes are condemned by Quanta Cura of Pius IX.Lionel: False. DH is not a rupture with the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus( Feeneyite).So it is not a break with the past ecclesiocentrism.Upon the old ecclesiology was based the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
Since there is known salvation outside the Church for Fr.Gleize, as there is for Pope Benedict,Dignitatis Humanae has to be a rupture with Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (Feeneyite) and the past ecclesiology of the Church.He is a liberal on this issue, without knowing it.It is his irrational theology which creates new doctrine. It is approved by the magisterium.
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) Gaudium et Spess 22 are not exceptions to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and the old ecclesiology of the Church. He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So there is a rupture with Tradition.
_____________________________________
2.The new ecumenical ecclesiology of Lumen Gentium is condemned by Pius XII in Mystici Corporis and Humani Generis because of the absolutely false principle which would like to establish a real distinction between the Church of Christ and the Catholic Church.
Lionel: With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) Lumen Gentium 16,14 and 8 does not contradict Mystici Corporis etc. So there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II.
Since Fr.Gleize only knows of Vatican Council II( Cushingite)there is a rupture with Tradition.
He refers to a 'false principle' but he does not know what is the false principle specifically He knows that Vatican Council II( Cushingite) is rupture with the past, and one can agree with him.However he has to switch to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which supports the old doctrines of the Church.
___________________________________
3. The ecumenism of Unitatis Redintegratio is condemned by Pius XI inMortalium Animos.
Lionel: No.It is not condemned with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).UR 3 is hypothetical and so it is not an explicit exception, or relevant, to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.
Fr.Gleize needs to explore Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and then his perspective will change.
__________________________________
4.The collegiality of Lumen Gentium, in that it denies the unicity of the subject of the Primacy, falls under the condemnation of Vatican I.
Lionel: This is his Cushingite interpretation. If there is unity of doctrine and theology with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), collegiality is not a problem.There will only be unity when Vatican Council II and Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is interpreted without invisible cases confused as being visible. 1
In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI gave the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then headed by Cardinal William Levada the task of continuing the dialogue with the Society of St Pius X on theological issues in the hope of attaining reconciliation.
The team responsible for the dialogue with the Society of St. Pius X on behalf of the Catholic Church included Charles Morerod, former Rector Magnificus and theology and philosophy professor of the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum. 2
Like the liberal Fr.Charles Morerod, Fr.Jean Marie Gleize was interpreting Vatican Council II in particular and all magisterial documents in general with irrational Cushingism philosophy and theology.Instead of using Feeneyite philosophy and theology and exposing the errors of Bishop Morerod, doctrinally, he remained 'on the other side'.He was a liberal.
-Lionel Andrades
1
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/frjean-marie-gl…
2.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue_betwee…
JUNE 26, 2017
Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-benedict-p…
June 24, 2017
Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/frjean-marie-gl…
Lionel L. Andrades- Posts : 60
Reputation : 158
Join date : 2015-05-11
Similar topics
» Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
» Bishops tell +Fellay: "Toss the Council to the Side"
» Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
» Recent Attempt to Sidetrack Rome Talks with SSPX
» THE DOCTRINAL VALUE OF THE ORDINARY TEACHING OF THE HOLY FATHER
» Bishops tell +Fellay: "Toss the Council to the Side"
» Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
» Recent Attempt to Sidetrack Rome Talks with SSPX
» THE DOCTRINAL VALUE OF THE ORDINARY TEACHING OF THE HOLY FATHER
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:23 am by tornpage
» Defilement of the Temple
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage
» Forum update
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage
» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
Thu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan
» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage
» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
Tue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage
» Isaiah 22:20-25
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage
» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage
» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan
» Do Feeneyites still exist?
Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne
» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage
» Inallible safety?
Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan
» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne
» Anyone still around?
Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne
» Angelqueen.org???
Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades