Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am



November 14, 2017

Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary,St.Benedict Center, Still River which last month was given granted canonical status negate the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II interpreted with the premise.1

The communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA are denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) as it was interpreted over the centuries.When they interpret Vatican Council II, with the irrational premise then the Council is a rupture with the dogam extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The St.Benedict Center, Still River, Mass.was given canonical status last month since they have accepted Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases interpreted as not being hypothetical, but concrete and known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is expected of them by the diocese.

The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney,  are not affirming Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical. It would mean that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc do not refer to known people. So they would not be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This too is an interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is a rational interpretation of the Council.

Like the bishops in Worcester, Manchester and Boston they are only viewing Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being a rupture with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.So Vatican Council II becomes a break with Tradition.

This is a negation of Feeneyite Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.They are using the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II to make it a rupture with Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.

They are interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise i.e invisible people are visible.Then the bishops use the same irrationality to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For them there are exceptions to the dogma. For them hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc are practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation by other liberals and also the traditionalists.

Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr.John Hardon and Fr. William Most also interpreted Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus with the baptism of desire etc being an exception.So they were not Feeneyites.They followed the error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.They mistook what is invisible as being visible.

Now the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are not affirming Feeneyite Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus when they accept Vatican Council II( with the premise),as if there is no choice.They are accepting Vatican Council II to compromise with their liberal bishops.They are not clarifying that they affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise, without hypothetical cases being interpreted as being non hypothetical.They need to clarify that the baptism of desire is invisible.If a person is saved with the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water, it cannot be a visible exception to Feeneyite Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.

They simply have to acknowedlge that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire. -Lionel Andrades

1.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/polish-traditionalists-handicapped.html

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 59
Reputation : 157
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum