Latest topics
» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM and Christine Niles approve liberal theology on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Christine Niles misses the elephant in the living room
Fri May 15, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Cardinal Pell recommends the Roman Forum and telling a lie
Wed May 13, 2015 9:43 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» GOOGLE CLOSES DOWN BLOG EUCHARIST AND MISSION
Tue May 12, 2015 9:23 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise. The SSPX could affirm this
Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:25 am by George Brenner

» Cardinal Raymond Burke approved Fr. John Hardon's error
Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:27 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:49 am by Lionel Andrades

» Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Church documents with an irrational premise and conclusion and offers the Traditional Latin Mass
Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:25 am by Lionel Andrades

» Beautiful Gregorian Chant
Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:10 pm by tornpage

» Fr.Robert Barron in Catholicism uses an irrational proposition to reach an irrational conclusion
Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:47 am by Lionel Andrades


Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal. It depends on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
If you consider Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani who issued the Letter to the Archbishop of Boston as not being in heresy, not making a mistake,  then the Council emerges as non traditional.It is a rupture with the past

If you consider Fr.Leonard Feeney, the subject of the Letter, as not being in heresy, not making a mistake, then the Council is not a break with Tradition. It has a continuity with the past
It's as simple as that.
Why?
Since for Cardinal Marchetti there was known salvation outside the Church.People who are in Heaven  were assumed to be seen on earth, visible in the flesh.
So they became for him exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
These cases in Heaven, apparitions, became a break with Tradition and the dogma.This was the reasoning used.Hypothetical cases became  objective exceptions.
This is irrational.Yet this was the reasoning of the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So we have a hermeneutic of rupture using Marchetti's reasoning.
Marchetti's error has been accepted by the magisterium since 1949. It is approved by the political Left, which condmens Feeneyism.It is now magisterial.
Feeneyism is traditional. It does not accept any exceptions to the dogma.
It does not reason irrationally. So Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma. There is no ambiguity in Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
So interpret Vatican Council II with the Marchetti error ( dead-saved and visible on earth) and LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 are  objective exceptions to the dogma. This is irrational reasoning.
Yet this is how Catholics interpret Vatican Council II.
Choose Tradition.
Choose Vatican Council II.Avoid the Marchetti error.

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 20
Reputation : 48
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum