Latest topics
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:59 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Padre Pio told Fr.Gabriel Amorth," It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false Church" -Bishop Richard Williamson
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Mons. Brunero Gherardini misled the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and many traditionalists
Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Andre Marie MICM too is teaching error : Bishop Sanborn cannot report at the Chancery office
Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:50 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magsiterial Heresy ?
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre
Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Brother Francis MICM made a mistake on Vatican Council II
Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:14 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Legion of Christ universities in Rome adapt to leftist laws
Fri May 22, 2015 7:53 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» CM, SSPX, MICM deny the Faith to please superiors
Thu May 21, 2015 4:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX and Church Militant are using the same liberal theology and are unaware of it
Wed May 20, 2015 9:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren
Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fr.John Zuhlsdorf condones Mass for suicide
Tue May 19, 2015 9:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office
Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Church Militant unable to answer questions on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Sun May 17, 2015 5:55 am by Lionel L. Andrades

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal. It depends on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
If you consider Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani who issued the Letter to the Archbishop of Boston as not being in heresy, not making a mistake,  then the Council emerges as non traditional.It is a rupture with the past

If you consider Fr.Leonard Feeney, the subject of the Letter, as not being in heresy, not making a mistake, then the Council is not a break with Tradition. It has a continuity with the past
It's as simple as that.
Since for Cardinal Marchetti there was known salvation outside the Church.People who are in Heaven  were assumed to be seen on earth, visible in the flesh.
So they became for him exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
These cases in Heaven, apparitions, became a break with Tradition and the dogma.This was the reasoning used.Hypothetical cases became  objective exceptions.
This is irrational.Yet this was the reasoning of the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So we have a hermeneutic of rupture using Marchetti's reasoning.
Marchetti's error has been accepted by the magisterium since 1949. It is approved by the political Left, which condmens Feeneyism.It is now magisterial.
Feeneyism is traditional. It does not accept any exceptions to the dogma.
It does not reason irrationally. So Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma. There is no ambiguity in Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
So interpret Vatican Council II with the Marchetti error ( dead-saved and visible on earth) and LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 are  objective exceptions to the dogma. This is irrational reasoning.
Yet this is how Catholics interpret Vatican Council II.
Choose Tradition.
Choose Vatican Council II.Avoid the Marchetti error.

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 30
Reputation : 74
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum