Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal depending on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Mon May 18, 2015 5:57 am

Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal. It depends on how you interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
If you consider Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani who issued the Letter to the Archbishop of Boston as not being in heresy, not making a mistake,  then the Council emerges as non traditional.It is a rupture with the past

If you consider Fr.Leonard Feeney, the subject of the Letter, as not being in heresy, not making a mistake, then the Council is not a break with Tradition. It has a continuity with the past
It's as simple as that.
Since for Cardinal Marchetti there was known salvation outside the Church.People who are in Heaven  were assumed to be seen on earth, visible in the flesh.
So they became for him exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
These cases in Heaven, apparitions, became a break with Tradition and the dogma.This was the reasoning used.Hypothetical cases became  objective exceptions.
This is irrational.Yet this was the reasoning of the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So we have a hermeneutic of rupture using Marchetti's reasoning.
Marchetti's error has been accepted by the magisterium since 1949. It is approved by the political Left, which condmens Feeneyism.It is now magisterial.
Feeneyism is traditional. It does not accept any exceptions to the dogma.
It does not reason irrationally. So Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma. There is no ambiguity in Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
So interpret Vatican Council II with the Marchetti error ( dead-saved and visible on earth) and LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 are  objective exceptions to the dogma. This is irrational reasoning.
Yet this is how Catholics interpret Vatican Council II.
Choose Tradition.
Choose Vatican Council II.Avoid the Marchetti error.

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 46
Reputation : 118
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum