Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades

Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Michael Voris uses liberal theology and yet critcizes Michael Coren

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Tue May 19, 2015 10:10 am

According to Michael Voris one needs Grace to be saved and that Grace is there in the Catholic Church.He said this in the Mic'd Up program on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
And yet acording to Michael Voris a person can have that grace outside the Church. So there is salvation outside the Church? In a Vortex issue on is there salvation for non Catholics, he says not every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church. So he assumes there is salvation outside the Church. He cites CCC 846. So he infers that those who are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known cases in the present times.They would have to be known to be exceptions. So for him they are exceptions to the dogma.Only if they are visible they can be exceptions.They are visible for his staff in Detroit. This is also being taught to school children there in Catechism class.

For Michael Voris there are exceptions since he cites the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) indirectly. This is his  theology whether he knows it or not.So there is salvation outside the Church for Michael Voris . So also for Christine. She quoted the Letter of the Holy Office on the Mic'd Up show.The Letter mentions exceptions to the Feeneyite version of the dogma.
Since there are exceptions to the dogma for Michael Voris according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846, he says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. This is Apparition Theology. It accomodates seeing the dead who are now in Heaven without the baptism of water.It  is based on knowing people in the present times (2015) who can or will be saved without 'faith and baptism' (AG 7).
So why all the fuss about Michael Coren leaving the Catholic Church and joining the Anglicans ?. According Church Militant's Apparition Theology Coren could be saved as an Anglican since there is known salvation outside the Church.He could be an exception to the dogma.
The Church Militant staff 's position on extra ecclesiam nulla salus is   contradictory and not traditional.They use the same liberal theology as the magisterium and many of the traditionalists, including the SSPX and the St.Benedict Centers.
It is  Cushingism. It comes from Marchetti's error. Mic'd Up participants  never mentioned Fr.Leonard  Feeney or affirmed clearly the rigorist interpretation of the dogma supported by Vatican Council II.
So with the Letter of the Holy Office and the Catechism of the Catholic Church they were on air, contradicting Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 which was cited in part. Christine omitted the phrase,'Jews, heretics and schismatics'
Regarding Coren, with  liberal theology on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, accepted at Church, he could be saved outside the Church, since there is salvation outside the Church according to the new theology. If there is one person who can be saved outside the Church then there could be many as the liberals believe.If there are many then....
He could be saved through Jesus and the Church as the Catechism  (846) and Michael Voris tells us.
Church Militant promotes the new theology on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the approval of the local bishop and the Vatican and yet criticizes Michael  Coren for leaving the  Catholic Church?
I mentioned in a previous post that Brother Andre Marie MICM has commented on the Mic'd Up Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus website. There is also a comment which  refers to him by the Church Militant Moderator.
Brother Andre Marie , Christine Niles and Fr.Roman Manchester are using the same liberal theology;the new theology on extra ecclesiam nulla salus .This is  approved by the magisterium.

The message which comes across is: the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are related to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

They needed to avoid entering into the liberal theology cycle.The new theology is an endless circle.It is based on an irrationality. For years supporters of the SSPX and the St.Benedict Centers have entered into this whirlpool both assuming they are correct, when really being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire refer to "zero cases", as John Martignoni put it. Their reasoning and theology is based on a zero case. This happens when they  link invincible ignorance etc with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Marchetti's original error.
The SSPX-St.Benedict arguments imply that there are known exceptions in the present times. These cases would be apparitions!
So there cannot really be anything in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite version of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.Physically, in real life we are dealing with zero cases.
Michael Coren is outside the Church, Jesus' Mystical Body and is on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14), the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257), Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, the Nicene Creed and John 3:5, Mark 16: 16).

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 46
Reputation : 118
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum