Latest topics
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News
Page 1 of 1
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
The religious community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Worcester,USA has canonical status and they affirm Vatican Council II with the premise like the two popes.When the SSPX does the same they also will be regularised.
The community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Manchester,USA,still do not have canonical status but they could be granted it in future.They also affirm Vatican Council II with some reservations.It is the same with Cardinal Raymond Burke, Michael Voris and other conservatives who criticize Vatican Council II but affirm it with an irrational premise which makes it a rupture with Tradition. They are approved by the present magisterium.
Then there are tradtionalists like Louie Verrecchio who reject Vatican Council II but still interpret it with an irrational premise.He does not choose Vatican Council II(premise free) since he still does not understand the concept.
None of all of them mentioned here can state that the two popes are in heresy for rejecting the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Since all of them have rejected the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church with their interpretation of Vatican Council II( with the premise) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with the premise).
When the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) in the diocese of Worcester affirm Vatican Council II with the premise they negate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney.Since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc are seen by them as visible and known cases saved outside the Church. So they become exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus).So they reject Vatican Council II.
They do not seem to know about Vatican Council II( premise -free).The MICM at the St.Benedict Center, Worcester do not state that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc refer to invisible people in 2017 and so are not exceptions to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.There is no announcement from them saying Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and in harmony with the missionaries of the 16th century, so they do not have a problem with the Council.This is good news for them.
There present irrational and non traditional interpretation of the Council is welcomed by the Jewish Left, the two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It is politically correct.It is not orthodox Catholic doctrine and theology.
The MICM communites know that Feeneyism is in harmony with the magisterium of the 16th century which did not know about the false premise.They know that to be a Catholic is to be a Feeneyite. To be a traditionalist is to be a Feeneyite.Feeneyism is part of the Catholic identity.
If the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the St.Benedict Center at Still River,Mass.USA ,would announce that they affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise there would be a stir.If they announce that they interpret hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical ; LG 16 is not an exception to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus there would be confusion at the Vatican, the Archdiocese of Boston and the rest of New England,USA.This would be seen as a rebellion. This is not the acceptable understanding between Catholic religious communities canonically recognised, and the popes and cardinals, who have all chosen the irrational premise.
If the MICM state that they affirm all magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, however interpret them all without the innovative premise,which is the basis for the new theology, and so are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church upon which depended the old theology of an ecumenism of return and the need for all non Christians to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation, there canonical status may be withdrawn. Once again they would disparagingly be called 'Feeneyites'.
They would be considered a bad example for other religious communities like the Franciscans, Dominicans, Carmelities, Redemptorists etc.They have always been granted canonical status since they interpret all magisterial documents with the false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
The community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Manchester,USA,still do not have canonical status but they could be granted it in future.They also affirm Vatican Council II with some reservations.It is the same with Cardinal Raymond Burke, Michael Voris and other conservatives who criticize Vatican Council II but affirm it with an irrational premise which makes it a rupture with Tradition. They are approved by the present magisterium.
Then there are tradtionalists like Louie Verrecchio who reject Vatican Council II but still interpret it with an irrational premise.He does not choose Vatican Council II(premise free) since he still does not understand the concept.
None of all of them mentioned here can state that the two popes are in heresy for rejecting the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Since all of them have rejected the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church with their interpretation of Vatican Council II( with the premise) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with the premise).
When the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) in the diocese of Worcester affirm Vatican Council II with the premise they negate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney.Since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc are seen by them as visible and known cases saved outside the Church. So they become exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus).So they reject Vatican Council II.
They do not seem to know about Vatican Council II( premise -free).The MICM at the St.Benedict Center, Worcester do not state that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc refer to invisible people in 2017 and so are not exceptions to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.There is no announcement from them saying Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and in harmony with the missionaries of the 16th century, so they do not have a problem with the Council.This is good news for them.
There present irrational and non traditional interpretation of the Council is welcomed by the Jewish Left, the two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It is politically correct.It is not orthodox Catholic doctrine and theology.
The MICM communites know that Feeneyism is in harmony with the magisterium of the 16th century which did not know about the false premise.They know that to be a Catholic is to be a Feeneyite. To be a traditionalist is to be a Feeneyite.Feeneyism is part of the Catholic identity.
If the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the St.Benedict Center at Still River,Mass.USA ,would announce that they affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise there would be a stir.If they announce that they interpret hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical ; LG 16 is not an exception to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus there would be confusion at the Vatican, the Archdiocese of Boston and the rest of New England,USA.This would be seen as a rebellion. This is not the acceptable understanding between Catholic religious communities canonically recognised, and the popes and cardinals, who have all chosen the irrational premise.
If the MICM state that they affirm all magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, however interpret them all without the innovative premise,which is the basis for the new theology, and so are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church upon which depended the old theology of an ecumenism of return and the need for all non Christians to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation, there canonical status may be withdrawn. Once again they would disparagingly be called 'Feeneyites'.
They would be considered a bad example for other religious communities like the Franciscans, Dominicans, Carmelities, Redemptorists etc.They have always been granted canonical status since they interpret all magisterial documents with the false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel L. Andrades- Posts : 60
Reputation : 158
Join date : 2015-05-11
Similar topics
» Mons. Brunero Gherardini misled the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and many traditionalists
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
» Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate forced to proclaim a lie
» Response to "On Feeneyism" poem
» Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Vatican's X-Files : irrational oath
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
» Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate forced to proclaim a lie
» Response to "On Feeneyism" poem
» Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Vatican's X-Files : irrational oath
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:23 am by tornpage
» Defilement of the Temple
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage
» Forum update
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage
» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
Thu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan
» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage
» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
Tue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage
» Isaiah 22:20-25
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage
» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage
» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan
» Do Feeneyites still exist?
Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne
» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage
» Inallible safety?
Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan
» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne
» Anyone still around?
Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne
» Angelqueen.org???
Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades