Latest topics
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:53 pm by Lionel L. Andrades

» Robert Siscoe and John of St. Thomas Respond to Fr. Cekada
Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo
Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:03 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Five Catholic academics accept the development of doctrine on salvation and Vatican Council II but reject it on morals and the death penalty
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:32 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him
Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» ]Christine Niles uses the false premise to interpret magisterial documents
Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart'
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No one shows Massimo Faggioli his precise theological and philosophical mistake
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:07 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:02 pm by tornpage

» Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict Center does not correct Frs.Brian Harrison and Cekada,Bishops Sanborn,Pirvanus,Kelly and Fellay
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:24 pm by MRyan

» Revisiting Diocese/Parish Screening Policy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:03 pm by MRyan

» When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:08 pm by MRyan

» Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:08 am by Lionel L. Andrades


Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism

Post  Lionel L. Andrades on Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am

The religious community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Worcester,USA has canonical status and they affirm Vatican Council II with the premise like the two popes.When the SSPX does the same they also will be regularised.
The community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Manchester,USA,still do not have canonical status but they could be granted it in future.They also affirm Vatican Council II with some reservations.It is the same with Cardinal Raymond Burke, Michael Voris and other conservatives who criticize Vatican Council II but affirm it with an irrational premise which makes it a rupture with Tradition. They are approved by the present magisterium.
Then there are tradtionalists like Louie Verrecchio who reject Vatican Council II but still interpret it with an irrational premise.He does not choose Vatican Council II(premise free) since he still does not understand the concept.
None of all of them mentioned here can state that the two popes are in heresy for rejecting the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Since all of them have rejected the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church with  their interpretation of Vatican Council II( with the premise) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with the premise).

When the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) in the diocese of Worcester affirm Vatican Council II with the premise they  negate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney.Since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc are seen by them as visible and known cases saved outside the Church. So they become exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus).So they reject Vatican Council II.

They do not seem to know about Vatican Council II( premise -free).The MICM at the St.Benedict Center, Worcester do not state that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc refer to invisible people in 2017 and so are not exceptions to the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.There is no announcement from them saying  Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and in harmony with the missionaries of the 16th century, so they do not have a problem with the Council.This is good news for them.
There present irrational and non traditional interpretation of the Council is welcomed by the Jewish Left, the two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It is politically correct.It is not orthodox Catholic doctrine and theology.

The MICM communites know that Feeneyism is in harmony with the magisterium of the 16th century which did not know about the false premise.They know that to be a Catholic is to be a Feeneyite. To be a traditionalist is to be a Feeneyite.Feeneyism is part of the Catholic identity.

If the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the St.Benedict Center at Still River,Mass.USA ,would announce that they affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise there would be a stir.If they announce that they interpret hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical ; LG 16 is not an exception to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus there would be confusion at the Vatican, the Archdiocese of Boston and the rest of New England,USA.This would be seen as a  rebellion. This is not the acceptable understanding between Catholic religious communities canonically recognised,  and the popes and cardinals, who have all chosen the irrational premise.

If the MICM state that they affirm all magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, however interpret them all without the innovative premise,which is the basis for the new theology, and so are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church upon which depended the old theology of an ecumenism of return and the need for all non Christians to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation, there canonical status may be withdrawn. Once again they would disparagingly be called 'Feeneyites'.
They would be considered a bad example for other religious communities like the Franciscans, Dominicans, Carmelities, Redemptorists etc.They have always been granted canonical status since they interpret all magisterial documents with the false premise to create a non traditional conclusion
.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel L. Andrades

Posts : 46
Reputation : 118
Join date : 2015-05-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum