Latest topics
SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: EENS Topics :: Debating Sedevacantism
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
NOVEMBER 23, 2017
SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
The writings and books of Archbishop Lefebvre are now obsolete and there is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX), and so at SSPX seminaries, his books should be seen as historical and important writings in the Catholic Church - but not an authentic interpretation of Vatican Council II, not an analysis of Vatican Council II.
Now we know that we can interpret Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and Vatican Council II without this posibilities- are- objective- in- the- present- times error.Possibilities are not exceptions to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus in 2017. Invisible- for- us baptism of desire is not a visible exception to Feeneyite Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.So the magisterium made a mistake and so did Archbishop Lefebvre and the traditionalists Hildrebrand, Michael Davies etc.They were as wrong as the liberals Ratzinger,Rahner, Kung,Congar,Schillebeeckx and others.Both groups were using the false premise i.e unknown people are known examples of salvation outside the Church.
So today the foundation for ecclesiology at SSPPX seminaries and pontifical seminaries in Rome is the same.Both groups use the false premise, the baptism of desire, for example, refers to visible people for them.
Both groups use the new theology which is based on invisible- for- us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance being visible. They are further considered examples of salvation outside the Church even though no one knows of any such case in real life.This is the false premise.
I repeat : for both groups there is known salvation outside the Church since they use a common premise.
So presently the Department of Theology at SSPX seminaries
is teaching ecclesiology, salvation theology, ecumenism etc with the false premise.It is the same at the John Lateran, Gregorian and Urbaniana university in Rome.
It is the same with the liberals and the present magisterium.So during the Vatican-SSPX Doctrinal Talks Fr. Jean Marie Gleize could not see the difference. He was using the same false new theology as Fr. Charles Morerod o.p and the result was a rupture with Tradition which was acceptable for Morerod but not for Gleize.
Prof Jean Marie Gleize who teaches Ecclesiology at the SSPX seminary in Econe,Switzerland still teaches theology with the false premise, since Archbishop Lefebvre did so. It is irrational, outdated and non traditional.It is heretical.It needs to be corrected.
For example being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of ones own, refers to people who are 'not there'.They could only be known to God.We humans cannot see a person saved in Heaven in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This was not known to Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal Ottaviani.This error is the theological foundation of the new ecumenism, new theology etc.
-Lionel Andrades
SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
The writings and books of Archbishop Lefebvre are now obsolete and there is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX), and so at SSPX seminaries, his books should be seen as historical and important writings in the Catholic Church - but not an authentic interpretation of Vatican Council II, not an analysis of Vatican Council II.
Now we know that we can interpret Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and Vatican Council II without this posibilities- are- objective- in- the- present- times error.Possibilities are not exceptions to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus in 2017. Invisible- for- us baptism of desire is not a visible exception to Feeneyite Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.So the magisterium made a mistake and so did Archbishop Lefebvre and the traditionalists Hildrebrand, Michael Davies etc.They were as wrong as the liberals Ratzinger,Rahner, Kung,Congar,Schillebeeckx and others.Both groups were using the false premise i.e unknown people are known examples of salvation outside the Church.
So today the foundation for ecclesiology at SSPPX seminaries and pontifical seminaries in Rome is the same.Both groups use the false premise, the baptism of desire, for example, refers to visible people for them.
Both groups use the new theology which is based on invisible- for- us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance being visible. They are further considered examples of salvation outside the Church even though no one knows of any such case in real life.This is the false premise.
I repeat : for both groups there is known salvation outside the Church since they use a common premise.
So presently the Department of Theology at SSPX seminaries
is teaching ecclesiology, salvation theology, ecumenism etc with the false premise.It is the same at the John Lateran, Gregorian and Urbaniana university in Rome.
It is the same with the liberals and the present magisterium.So during the Vatican-SSPX Doctrinal Talks Fr. Jean Marie Gleize could not see the difference. He was using the same false new theology as Fr. Charles Morerod o.p and the result was a rupture with Tradition which was acceptable for Morerod but not for Gleize.
Prof Jean Marie Gleize who teaches Ecclesiology at the SSPX seminary in Econe,Switzerland still teaches theology with the false premise, since Archbishop Lefebvre did so. It is irrational, outdated and non traditional.It is heretical.It needs to be corrected.
For example being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of ones own, refers to people who are 'not there'.They could only be known to God.We humans cannot see a person saved in Heaven in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This was not known to Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal Ottaviani.This error is the theological foundation of the new ecumenism, new theology etc.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel L. Andrades- Posts : 60
Reputation : 158
Join date : 2015-05-11
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: EENS Topics :: Debating Sedevacantism
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
» Piazza Spagna - mission
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
» Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation