Latest topics
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essential
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» When Card. Ladaria and Bp Fellay meet a non Catholic they know he or she is oriented to Hell because the Church lic Church inspired by the Holy Spirit teaches this
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:49 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:44 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:42 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Now it is the time for cardinals Kasper and Marx to reject Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II
Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:35 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Schism over Vatican Council II ?
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:30 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX recognises that Abp.Lefebvre's writings are obsolete : seminaries have to make the correction
Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:25 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake
Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:20 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:18 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error
Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:47 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it
Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Two popes must ask all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) as they do
Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Still River Ma., could lose canomical status because of Feeneyism
Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:54 am by Lionel L. Andrades

»  Traditionalists oppose Pope Francis on morals but give him a pass on salvation
Fri Oct 27, 2017 10:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades


PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Go down

PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  simple Faith on Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:57 am

Just read that a Bishop ( Samuel Aquila of Fargo) is changing the order by which children in his diocese receive the sacraments and he has received papal approval for doing so.
I was not aware of this but it seems that he is in fact 'restoring' the order in which children originally received the sacraments: baptism, confirmation then first Holy Conmunion.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/bishop-aquila-receives-popes-praise-for-reordering-sacraments/

Anyone else heard of this before? Is this a good change? I would be interested to hear others thoughts or opinions.
avatar
simple Faith

Posts : 164
Reputation : 179
Join date : 2011-01-19

Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  Guest on Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:11 pm

That's how it's done in the Eastern rite (Byzantine). They baptize the baby, then confirm (Chrismate), and then they give the baby communion.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  simple Faith on Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:04 pm

Hi Rasha, the plot thickens, at what age in the Eastern rite (Byzantine) does this happen?
avatar
simple Faith

Posts : 164
Reputation : 179
Join date : 2011-01-19

Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  Guest on Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:05 am

Newborns.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  Guest on Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:06 am

Children under the age of reason can receive communion at every Liturgy. Once they reach the age of reason, they receive catechisis, and make their first confession and then they have what is called the "First Solemn Communion".

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  Guest on Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:09 am


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  columba on Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:19 pm

RashaLampa wrote:Children under the age of reason can receive communion at every Liturgy. Once they reach the age of reason, they receive catechisis, and make their first confession and then they have what is called the "First Solemn Communion".

Hmmm. When there are two or more ways of proceeding, among the choices one of those ways is usually the better way. (In your opinion) do you think that the Byzantine way is best and why?

I have here in mind the two forms of the Mass. I believe that one form is superior to the other which makes the other (at least) inferior.
avatar
columba

Posts : 979
Reputation : 1068
Join date : 2010-12-18
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: PROPER ORDER OF SACRAMENTS. CONFIRMATION BEFORE EUCHARIST

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum