Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum)
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum)

The owner of this forum submits to the authority of Pope Francis, current Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church.

Latest topics
» The Unity of the Body (the Church, Israel)
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyThu Apr 04, 2024 8:46 am by tornpage

» Defilement of the Temple
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyTue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage

» Forum update
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptySat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage

» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyThu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan

» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyFri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage

» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage

» Isaiah 22:20-25
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage

» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyFri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage

» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyThu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan

» Do Feeneyites still exist?
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyWed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne

» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptySat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage

» Inallible safety?
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyThu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan

» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage

» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan

» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyFri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne

» Anyone still around?
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyMon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne

» Angelqueen.org???
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptyTue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul

» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Piazza Spagna - mission
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades

» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II EmptySun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades


The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News

Go down

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II Empty The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Post  Lionel Andrades Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:03 am

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II Logo%20St%20Pie%20XThe Society of St.Pius X uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  in its interpretation of Vatican Council II.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE
1.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949( also referred to as the Suprema Haec by progressivists) assumes that all salvation in Heaven ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc) are physically visible on earth. These visible in the flesh cases of the deceased who are now saved and in Heaven, it is inferred are explicit exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.THEY ARE VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES.
This irrationality forms also the thelogical understanding of Vatican Council II for the SSPX and the liberals.

VATICAN COUNCIL II
2.The SSPX rejects Vatican Council II since for them  being saved with ' a ray of the Truth(NA 2), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), elements of sanctification and truth(LG Cool, invincible ignorance(LG 16) ARE ALSO VISIBLE IN THE FLESH CASES. So for the SSPX they are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Since there are visible in the flesh exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus the  SSPX  rejects Vatican Council II.

The same error is there also in the Letter of the Holy Office but the SSPX accepts the Letter of the Holy Office. Archbishop Lefebvre approved the Letter of the Holy Office.

Archbishop Lefebvre made the same irrational error in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II.

The liberals use the same irrationality.They however except Vatican Council II.

Ambrose on the forum CathInfo notices: .
It is good that you see this, because there are many who falsely attribute the teaching of the 1949 letter(Letter of the Holy Office) with Vatican II theology.
 1

When the SSPX bishops and priests are  aware of this error they simply have to affirm that all salvation in Heaven is visible and known only to God and is not physically visible to us on earth.
This will set things right.  Catholics will understand.  They will see that Vatican Council II is traditional.-Lionel Andrades
1.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=33276&min=9&num=3

Lionel Andrades

Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic News

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum