Latest topics
Rasha's Sedevacantism Debate on PalTalk
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: EENS Topics :: Debating Sedevacantism
Page 1 of 1
Rasha's Sedevacantism Debate on PalTalk
RashaLampa: Hi
Traddy: hi
RashaLampa: Listening to the Dimonds, eh?
Traddy: can you hear the audio ?
RashaLampa: yeah
Traddy: great
RashaLampa: Are you one of the Dimonds?
Traddy: no
RashaLampa: I saw on CathInfo that this forum exists
RashaLampa: I mean this chat room
Traddy: Yes
RashaLampa: So you are a Sede then?
RashaLampa: I am a non-Sedevacantist and a Feeneyite
Traddy: I am not a sedevacantist
RashaLampa: Oh I see...
RashaLampa: Are you a Feeneyite?
Traddy: I make no judgement as to whether Benedict is or is not the true Pope
Traddy: I am a Feeneyite
RashaLampa:
Traddy: I do not accept Benedict as being the true Pope, nor do I reject him as being the true Pope,..I am undecided
RashaLampa: Have you ever been over to the Pascendi forum?
RashaLampa: That is my favorite hang-out
Traddy: I have seen Pascendi's website and listened to his videos on Youtube
Traddy: he is a heretic
RashaLampa: heretic?
RashaLampa: In what way?
Traddy: he believes that the anti-popes began in the early 20th century
RashaLampa: no no
Traddy: or late 19 century
RashaLampa: we are not talking about the same guy here
Traddy: Thats what I had seen on his website
RashaLampa: http://pascendi2.websitetoolbox.com/
Traddy: hmmm
RashaLampa: You are talking about
RashaLampa: that other dude
RashaLampa: CM
Traddy: whats his Youtube name ?
RashaLampa: the guy that was banned from CathInfo
RashaLampa: I don't know what his youtube name is exactly but he doesn't really have any religious youtube videos
RashaLampa: they are mostly videos of flying model airplanes
RashaLampa: and stuff
Traddy: really ?
Traddy: then we must be speaking of two different persons
RashaLampa: He is a non-sedevacantist Feeneyite like me
RashaLampa: So has anyone come into your room?
RashaLampa: other than me?
Traddy: are you agnostic as to whether Benedict is a true Pope, or are you completely against the position by some traditional Catholics that the seat of Peter is empty ?
RashaLampa: I believe that there must be some kind of legal process to determine
RashaLampa: if a Pope is in formal heresy
Traddy: a few have come into my room and left,..but most all so called "catholics" in Paltalk are modernist Novus Ordo so called "catholics"
RashaLampa: I mean even the Council of Florence says that we can go to those priests for sacraments who have not been excommunicated by name.
Traddy: actually Canon law says that any heretic automatically loses their office in the Church ipso facto without any Church Declaration
RashaLampa: If the Pope could never be a heretic wouldn't everything he says be infallible?
RashaLampa: Then there would be no use for distinguishing what is ex-cathedra and what is not.
RashaLampa: Because everything would be guaranteed not to be heretical.
RashaLampa: I think to lose his office formal heresy would have to be determined
RashaLampa: but until someone is actually brought up on trial how do we know if the heresy is formal or not?
RashaLampa: Vatican II Popes say stuff that can be taken every which way
Traddy: a Pope can say something that is not infallible before any dogma is already established without being a heretic, but once dogma is established by the Church, then any Catholic who rejects even just one dogma automatically ex-communicates themselves from the Church ipso facto
RashaLampa: Ok I get your point
Traddy: how can anyone claim Benedict is just a material heretic ? Obviously he would be a formal heretic since he sites past dogmas of the Church and then rejects those dogmas,..though I will still not claim he is a heretic
Traddy: I won't judge him
RashaLampa: Yeah but I think that the problem with modernism
RashaLampa: is it is more of a theological method than a
RashaLampa: doctrine per se.
RashaLampa: So priests who are formed in it think they are allowed to hold contrary opinions in their mind.
RashaLampa: SO that is why Pope Benedict will say weird stuff
Traddy: any theological belief put forth which contradicts any Church Dogma is to be seen as a heretical belief
RashaLampa: but then say that you need to interpret Vatican II according to tradition
RashaLampa: Yes, I agree
RashaLampa: but again materially heretical
RashaLampa: in most cases
RashaLampa: For example a lot of people think EENS is not true
RashaLampa: because Fr. Feeney was "excommunicated"
RashaLampa: Yet if the Pope came out and clarified it they would submit
RashaLampa: to the dogmatic definitions
Traddy: there is no way possible Benedict could be considered to be only a material heretic since he knows Catholic dogmatic teachings and rejects them
Traddy: he-- would have to be seen as a formal heretic
RashaLampa: Well he's never really been questioned on it
RashaLampa: It's like that whole "subsists" thing with Vatican II
RashaLampa: after 40 years the CDF finally came out and said that "subsists" really means "is"
RashaLampa: The Church of Christ "subsists" in the Catholic Church
Traddy: would you say that Jim Jones was a heretic ?
RashaLampa: Was he a baptized Catholic?
RashaLampa: originally?
Traddy: don't know
RashaLampa: From wikipedia it looks like he was just a pagan
Traddy: would you say protestants are heretics ?
RashaLampa: Yes.
Traddy: have you questioned every single protestant to come to that conclusion ?
RashaLampa: But again some of them could be material heretics
RashaLampa: even the Dimonds agree with that
RashaLampa: The question really is when does a baptized person become a non-Catholic
Traddy: but you can't claim Benedict is a material heretic because he knows Catholic teaching
RashaLampa: How do I know that he knows it?
RashaLampa: Maybe he received crappy seminary formation.
RashaLampa: maybe Cardinal Ratzinger received bad seminary formation
Traddy: because Benedict has written many books on Catholic teaching and is a theological scholar of the Church,...he has stated dogmatic teachings of the Church and then later rejects those same dogmas in his statements
Then we got interrupted by someone else coming into the chatroom
Traddy: hi
RashaLampa: Listening to the Dimonds, eh?
Traddy: can you hear the audio ?
RashaLampa: yeah
Traddy: great
RashaLampa: Are you one of the Dimonds?
Traddy: no
RashaLampa: I saw on CathInfo that this forum exists
RashaLampa: I mean this chat room
Traddy: Yes
RashaLampa: So you are a Sede then?
RashaLampa: I am a non-Sedevacantist and a Feeneyite
Traddy: I am not a sedevacantist
RashaLampa: Oh I see...
RashaLampa: Are you a Feeneyite?
Traddy: I make no judgement as to whether Benedict is or is not the true Pope
Traddy: I am a Feeneyite
RashaLampa:
Traddy: I do not accept Benedict as being the true Pope, nor do I reject him as being the true Pope,..I am undecided
RashaLampa: Have you ever been over to the Pascendi forum?
RashaLampa: That is my favorite hang-out
Traddy: I have seen Pascendi's website and listened to his videos on Youtube
Traddy: he is a heretic
RashaLampa: heretic?
RashaLampa: In what way?
Traddy: he believes that the anti-popes began in the early 20th century
RashaLampa: no no
Traddy: or late 19 century
RashaLampa: we are not talking about the same guy here
Traddy: Thats what I had seen on his website
RashaLampa: http://pascendi2.websitetoolbox.com/
Traddy: hmmm
RashaLampa: You are talking about
RashaLampa: that other dude
RashaLampa: CM
Traddy: whats his Youtube name ?
RashaLampa: the guy that was banned from CathInfo
RashaLampa: I don't know what his youtube name is exactly but he doesn't really have any religious youtube videos
RashaLampa: they are mostly videos of flying model airplanes
RashaLampa: and stuff
Traddy: really ?
Traddy: then we must be speaking of two different persons
RashaLampa: He is a non-sedevacantist Feeneyite like me
RashaLampa: So has anyone come into your room?
RashaLampa: other than me?
Traddy: are you agnostic as to whether Benedict is a true Pope, or are you completely against the position by some traditional Catholics that the seat of Peter is empty ?
RashaLampa: I believe that there must be some kind of legal process to determine
RashaLampa: if a Pope is in formal heresy
Traddy: a few have come into my room and left,..but most all so called "catholics" in Paltalk are modernist Novus Ordo so called "catholics"
RashaLampa: I mean even the Council of Florence says that we can go to those priests for sacraments who have not been excommunicated by name.
Traddy: actually Canon law says that any heretic automatically loses their office in the Church ipso facto without any Church Declaration
RashaLampa: If the Pope could never be a heretic wouldn't everything he says be infallible?
RashaLampa: Then there would be no use for distinguishing what is ex-cathedra and what is not.
RashaLampa: Because everything would be guaranteed not to be heretical.
RashaLampa: I think to lose his office formal heresy would have to be determined
RashaLampa: but until someone is actually brought up on trial how do we know if the heresy is formal or not?
RashaLampa: Vatican II Popes say stuff that can be taken every which way
Traddy: a Pope can say something that is not infallible before any dogma is already established without being a heretic, but once dogma is established by the Church, then any Catholic who rejects even just one dogma automatically ex-communicates themselves from the Church ipso facto
RashaLampa: Ok I get your point
Traddy: how can anyone claim Benedict is just a material heretic ? Obviously he would be a formal heretic since he sites past dogmas of the Church and then rejects those dogmas,..though I will still not claim he is a heretic
Traddy: I won't judge him
RashaLampa: Yeah but I think that the problem with modernism
RashaLampa: is it is more of a theological method than a
RashaLampa: doctrine per se.
RashaLampa: So priests who are formed in it think they are allowed to hold contrary opinions in their mind.
RashaLampa: SO that is why Pope Benedict will say weird stuff
Traddy: any theological belief put forth which contradicts any Church Dogma is to be seen as a heretical belief
RashaLampa: but then say that you need to interpret Vatican II according to tradition
RashaLampa: Yes, I agree
RashaLampa: but again materially heretical
RashaLampa: in most cases
RashaLampa: For example a lot of people think EENS is not true
RashaLampa: because Fr. Feeney was "excommunicated"
RashaLampa: Yet if the Pope came out and clarified it they would submit
RashaLampa: to the dogmatic definitions
Traddy: there is no way possible Benedict could be considered to be only a material heretic since he knows Catholic dogmatic teachings and rejects them
Traddy: he-- would have to be seen as a formal heretic
RashaLampa: Well he's never really been questioned on it
RashaLampa: It's like that whole "subsists" thing with Vatican II
RashaLampa: after 40 years the CDF finally came out and said that "subsists" really means "is"
RashaLampa: The Church of Christ "subsists" in the Catholic Church
Traddy: would you say that Jim Jones was a heretic ?
RashaLampa: Was he a baptized Catholic?
RashaLampa: originally?
Traddy: don't know
RashaLampa: From wikipedia it looks like he was just a pagan
Traddy: would you say protestants are heretics ?
RashaLampa: Yes.
Traddy: have you questioned every single protestant to come to that conclusion ?
RashaLampa: But again some of them could be material heretics
RashaLampa: even the Dimonds agree with that
RashaLampa: The question really is when does a baptized person become a non-Catholic
Traddy: but you can't claim Benedict is a material heretic because he knows Catholic teaching
RashaLampa: How do I know that he knows it?
RashaLampa: Maybe he received crappy seminary formation.
RashaLampa: maybe Cardinal Ratzinger received bad seminary formation
Traddy: because Benedict has written many books on Catholic teaching and is a theological scholar of the Church,...he has stated dogmatic teachings of the Church and then later rejects those same dogmas in his statements
Then we got interrupted by someone else coming into the chatroom
Guest- Guest
Re: Rasha's Sedevacantism Debate on PalTalk
Hi Rasha
I'm the traditional Catholic you were having that discussion with in Paltalk. I had gone to that Pascendi forum you told me about and I saw the thread about it coming to an end and you starting up a new Catholic Forum. So here I am.
(by the way, to everyone who reads this thread,..I am not a sede-vacantist, but was simply giving the position of how the sedes see things. I personally make no judgement on Benedict.)
I'm the traditional Catholic you were having that discussion with in Paltalk. I had gone to that Pascendi forum you told me about and I saw the thread about it coming to an end and you starting up a new Catholic Forum. So here I am.
(by the way, to everyone who reads this thread,..I am not a sede-vacantist, but was simply giving the position of how the sedes see things. I personally make no judgement on Benedict.)
Last edited by Catholic_Truth on Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Re: Rasha's Sedevacantism Debate on PalTalk
Oh hi....welcome to the forum. I changed our names up above. I just wanted the input of the forum participants here on our discussion.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Paltalk Traditional Catholic Chat Debate room
» Does Atheism Poison Everything? Debate
» Sedevacantism OK as opinion,but not fact??
» A Refutation of the Heresy of Sedevacantism
» Arguments against sedevacantism
» Does Atheism Poison Everything? Debate
» Sedevacantism OK as opinion,but not fact??
» A Refutation of the Heresy of Sedevacantism
» Arguments against sedevacantism
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: EENS Topics :: Debating Sedevacantism
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thu Apr 04, 2024 8:46 am by tornpage
» Defilement of the Temple
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage
» Forum update
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage
» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
Thu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan
» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage
» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
Tue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage
» Isaiah 22:20-25
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage
» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage
» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan
» Do Feeneyites still exist?
Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne
» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage
» Inallible safety?
Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan
» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne
» Anyone still around?
Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne
» Angelqueen.org???
Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades