Latest topics
The SSPX has a trump card and its time to play it.
2 posters
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic Apologetics
Page 1 of 1
The SSPX has a trump card and its time to play it.
Start making simple objective statements.
1. We don’t know anyone dead and saved in 2012.
2. We cannot know the dead saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (Lumen Gentium 16) etc.
3. So Lumen Gentiuem 16, Vatican Council II does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
4. Since Ad Gentes 7 is in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus it has to be in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors.
5. Vatican Council II is in accord with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors and there are no exceptions of the visible dead i.e knowing the dead saved in 2012 .
6. Vatican Council II is a traditional Council just like the Council of Trent.
7. There is no theological basis for the new ecumenism.It’s foundation is the Richard Cushing Error, of being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
8. This Cushing Error is the basis of the theology of religions and the ecclesiology of communion.
9. Those who affirm Vatican Council II with the Cushing Error of being able to see the dead alive, who are supposed to be exceptions to the defined dogma, are in heresy. They are contradicting the dogma on exclusive salvation, Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the magisterial documents of Pope John Paul II.(Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc).
10. Religious in public heresy are not permitted, according to Canon Law, to offer Holy Mass, the Novus Ordo Mass or the Traditional Latin Mass.
Canonically a Catholic, SSPX or non SSPX , cannot be expected to accept Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.Every good Catholic must reject this version of the Council.
-Lionel Andrades
1. We don’t know anyone dead and saved in 2012.
2. We cannot know the dead saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (Lumen Gentium 16) etc.
3. So Lumen Gentiuem 16, Vatican Council II does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
4. Since Ad Gentes 7 is in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus it has to be in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors.
5. Vatican Council II is in accord with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors and there are no exceptions of the visible dead i.e knowing the dead saved in 2012 .
6. Vatican Council II is a traditional Council just like the Council of Trent.
7. There is no theological basis for the new ecumenism.It’s foundation is the Richard Cushing Error, of being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
8. This Cushing Error is the basis of the theology of religions and the ecclesiology of communion.
9. Those who affirm Vatican Council II with the Cushing Error of being able to see the dead alive, who are supposed to be exceptions to the defined dogma, are in heresy. They are contradicting the dogma on exclusive salvation, Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the magisterial documents of Pope John Paul II.(Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc).
10. Religious in public heresy are not permitted, according to Canon Law, to offer Holy Mass, the Novus Ordo Mass or the Traditional Latin Mass.
Canonically a Catholic, SSPX or non SSPX , cannot be expected to accept Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.Every good Catholic must reject this version of the Council.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades- Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08
Re: The SSPX has a trump card and its time to play it.
Lionel, if the SSPX has a “trump card”, you’re not holding it.
And every Mass said outside the jurisdiction of the Pope and his appointed bishops is at least illicit, and easily schismatic. Btw, the only authority who can make such judgments as to who can and cannot offer Mass in his diocese is the local Ordinary who has immediate jurisdiction, and not arm-chair experts in canon-law.
But you do like to peddle it, no?
Correct, neither Baptized nor non-baptized.Lionel wrote: Start making simple objective statements.
1. We don’t know anyone dead and saved in 2012.
And we cannot know the dead saved in right faith and a good conscience.2. We cannot know the dead saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (Lumen Gentium 16) etc.
Correct, for it has NOTHING to do with “visible salvation in invincible ignorance” or with “dead men walking”, two of the most inane concepts this side of "the remission of sins without sanctification".3. So Lumen Gentiuem 16, Vatican Council II does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Correct, there is no contradiction in matters of faith or irreformable morals/disciplines.4. Since Ad Gentes 7 is in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus it has to be in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors.
A ridiculous straw-man as there is no such “implication” of “the visible dead i.e knowing the dead saved in 2012”. Please.5. Vatican Council II is in accord with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors and there are no exceptions of the visible dead i.e knowing the dead saved in 2012.
In doctrine, it certainly is, while it did develop certain points of doctrine, and engaged in a rather “nontraditional” pastoral approach.6. Vatican Council II is a traditional Council just like the Council of Trent.
Oh, stop it. The end objective of ecumenism remains the same as always, while engaging in a more open and non-confrontational approach which recognizes the elements of good that exists in other sects and traditions.7. There is no theological basis for the new ecumenism. It’s foundation is the Richard Cushing Error, of being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
That makes no sense whatsoever.8. This Cushing Error is the basis of the theology of religions and the ecclesiology of communion.
I accept VCII (all of it) “and the magisterial documents of Pope John Paul II. (Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc)”, but I do not see the living dead, and I do not believe in “exceptions” to the salvation dogmas. So I guess I am not in “heresy”! Whew.9. Those who affirm Vatican Council II with the Cushing Error of being able to see the dead alive, who are supposed to be exceptions to the defined dogma, are in heresy. They are contradicting the dogma on exclusive salvation, Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the magisterial documents of Pope John Paul II.(Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc).
And your point is?10. Religious in public heresy are not permitted, according to Canon Law, to offer Holy Mass, the Novus Ordo Mass or the Traditional Latin Mass.
And every Mass said outside the jurisdiction of the Pope and his appointed bishops is at least illicit, and easily schismatic. Btw, the only authority who can make such judgments as to who can and cannot offer Mass in his diocese is the local Ordinary who has immediate jurisdiction, and not arm-chair experts in canon-law.
No one can be expected to accept your irrational premise that accuses others of seeing dead men walking and visible salvation in invincible ignorance.Canonically a Catholic, SSPX or non SSPX , cannot be expected to accept Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. Every good Catholic must reject this version of the Council.
But you do like to peddle it, no?
MRyan- Posts : 2314
Reputation : 2492
Join date : 2010-12-18
Re: The SSPX has a trump card and its time to play it.
3. So Lumen Gentiuem 16, Vatican Council II does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
MRyan
Correct, for it has NOTHING to do with “visible salvation in invincible ignorance” or with “dead men walking”, two of the most inane concepts this side of "the remission of sins without sanctification".
Lionel
For quite a few years on this forum Vatican Council II was supposed to be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the same problem being faced by the SSPX. This is the same error made by Archbishop Augustine Di Noia in an interview with the National Catholic Register.He assumed also, that implicit salvation was explicit.
Since they assumed that there were dead men walking and visible and saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire theologically the battle would continue if the baptism of desire resulted in justification or salvation.
Lionel Andrades- Posts : 260
Reputation : 384
Join date : 2013-01-08
Similar topics
» German SSPX Threatens Theater Staging Blasphemous Play
» SSPX Petitions German Bishops to Make Reparations for Blasphemous Play
» SSPX-ROME Holy See Communiqué: SSPX invited to "clarify" UPDATES: today's meeting; why the Pope will not give up
» Pope JP I identity card sold on ebay.
» Prosecutor Investigates Blasphemous Play
» SSPX Petitions German Bishops to Make Reparations for Blasphemous Play
» SSPX-ROME Holy See Communiqué: SSPX invited to "clarify" UPDATES: today's meeting; why the Pope will not give up
» Pope JP I identity card sold on ebay.
» Prosecutor Investigates Blasphemous Play
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum (No Salvation Outside the Church Forum) :: Other topics :: Catholic Apologetics
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thu Apr 04, 2024 8:46 am by tornpage
» Defilement of the Temple
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:44 am by tornpage
» Forum update
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 am by tornpage
» Bishop Williamson's Recent Comments
Thu Feb 01, 2024 12:42 pm by MRyan
» The Mysterious 45 days of Daniel 12:11-12
Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:04 am by tornpage
» St. Bonaventure on the Necessity of Baptism
Tue Jan 23, 2024 7:06 pm by tornpage
» Isaiah 22:20-25
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:44 am by tornpage
» Translation of Bellarmine's De Amissione Gratiae, Bk. VI
Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:04 am by tornpage
» Orestes Brownson Nails it on Baptism of Desire
Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:06 pm by MRyan
» Do Feeneyites still exist?
Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:02 am by Jehanne
» Sedevacantism and the Church's Indefectibility
Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:22 pm by tornpage
» Inallible safety?
Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:47 pm by MRyan
» Usury - Has the Church Erred?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:05 pm by tornpage
» Rethink "Feeneyism"?
Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:40 pm by MRyan
» SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II because of the restrictions placed by the Jewish Left
Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:57 am by Jehanne
» Anyone still around?
Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:04 pm by Jehanne
» Angelqueen.org???
Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:38 am by Paul
» Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objection if the SSPX and all religious communities affirm Vatican Council II (without the premise)
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:29 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Piazza Spagna - mission
Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:06 am by Lionel L. Andrades
» Fund,Catholic organisation needed to help Catholic priests in Italy like Fr. Alessandro Minutella
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:52 am by Lionel L. Andrades